On the hadith that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) allocated a portion of the Ma'rib salt to one of the Companions.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : On the hadith that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) allocated a portion of the Ma'rib salt to one of the Companions.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : In the hadith, in its chain, is Thabit ibn Sa'id ibn Hamad ibn Umayyah, and this man, I mean, I returned to him in "Mizan al-I'tidal" and found that he is not known.
The Shaykh : He is unknown.
The questioner : In "al-Tahdhib", it means it quotes the statements of Ibn Hibban and al-Nasa'i in the Sunan, and it says that he read it in the handwriting of al-Dhahabi that the man is not known.
The Shaykh : That he is what?
The questioner : That he is not known.
The Shaykh : He is not known, yes.
The questioner : As for this hadith, is it authentic, or does it have other routes that strengthen it, or?
The Shaykh : No, I do not remember the answer to this hadith exactly, whether it is authentic or not? It is recorded for me, but I am not recalling it right now. But we need to see what you are interested in from the hadith. It is possible that there is something that suffices for it, or are you just asking about this hadith without wanting anything behind it?
The questioner : No, no, it means the jurists have not built things upon it, many things regarding ownership.
The Shaykh : Yes, yes, for example, the allocation of land.
The questioner : Yes, because he allocated this to him.
The Shaykh : Yes, I mean, do you want from your question about the hadith, whether it is authentic or not? In the sense that if it is authentic, it indicates the permissibility of land allocation, and if it is not authentic, is there anything that contradicts land allocation? Do you want this, or what do you want?
The questioner : No, no, I just want the chain, I mean.
The Shaykh : Yes, I did not recall it, I mean, I told you about this, please go ahead.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : In the hadith, in its chain, is Thabit ibn Sa'id ibn Hamad ibn Umayyah, and this man, I mean, I returned to him in "Mizan al-I'tidal" and found that he is not known.
The Shaykh : He is unknown.
The questioner : In "al-Tahdhib", it means it quotes the statements of Ibn Hibban and al-Nasa'i in the Sunan, and it says that he read it in the handwriting of al-Dhahabi that the man is not known.
The Shaykh : That he is what?
The questioner : That he is not known.
The Shaykh : He is not known, yes.
The questioner : As for this hadith, is it authentic, or does it have other routes that strengthen it, or?
The Shaykh : No, I do not remember the answer to this hadith exactly, whether it is authentic or not? It is recorded for me, but I am not recalling it right now. But we need to see what you are interested in from the hadith. It is possible that there is something that suffices for it, or are you just asking about this hadith without wanting anything behind it?
The questioner : No, no, it means the jurists have not built things upon it, many things regarding ownership.
The Shaykh : Yes, yes, for example, the allocation of land.
The questioner : Yes, because he allocated this to him.
The Shaykh : Yes, I mean, do you want from your question about the hadith, whether it is authentic or not? In the sense that if it is authentic, it indicates the permissibility of land allocation, and if it is not authentic, is there anything that contradicts land allocation? Do you want this, or what do you want?
The questioner : No, no, I just want the chain, I mean.
The Shaykh : Yes, I did not recall it, I mean, I told you about this, please go ahead.
The questioner : ... .