Is the blood money of the murdered person given only to the heirs?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner: ... of the wealth that is inherited by the deceased?
The Shaykh: How?
The questioner: Is the blood money considered part of the ... that the deceased leaves behind? A person was killed, and the Bedouin pay his blood money ... Is this blood money given to the heirs or to his family? Because it is a matter of vengeance, and taking vengeance is a right belonging to the family ...?
The Shaykh: Who are the family and who are the heirs?
The questioner: The family is the brother, the heirs are ... .
The Shaykh: The wife, the son, and the ... .
The questioner: The husband, because she is a woman, the husband, the son, the sister, and the mother, and she has a brother, and her brother ... took the blood money, does he take it ...?
The Shaykh: I mean, if the brother's son demands the blood money, does he take it?
The questioner: No.
The Shaykh : Then?
The questioner: The blood money.
The Shaykh: Do not rush, your example is that the brother demanded the blood money.
The questioner: He took it.
The Shaykh: He took it.
The questioner: He took it from the killer.
The Shaykh: Yes, yes, so because he is the one who demanded the blood money, it became his property?
The questioner: Of course not, from here ... .
The Shaykh : So then.
The questioner: The blood money is the same.
The Shaykh: That is why I changed your example from the brother to the brother's son, the brother's son is the one who demanded the blood money and obtained it; does he own it?
The questioner : Of course not.
The Shaykh: We will proceed step by step, so if he did not own the blood money, who will own it then?
The questioner: The heirs.
The Shaykh: There is no other way.
Another questioner: Is the blood money for the 'Aqilah as 'Umar used to say?
The Shaykh: No, my brother, the blood money is upon the 'Aqilah, his question is not about that.
Another questioner: There was 'Umar who used to say: The blood money is for the 'Aqilah, and a woman does not inherit from her husband's wealth.
Eid Abbasi: From her husband's wealth, from her husband's blood money.
Another questioner: From her husband's blood money, anything, this is what 'Umar used to issue a ruling on, then when he learned that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) inherited for the woman of Ashim al-Dabbabi from her husband's blood money, he returned and retracted that, and issued a ruling that the blood money is for the heirs, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) inherited for the woman of Ashim al-Dabbabi from her blood money.
The questioner: The blood money is for the heirs.
Another questioner: It is settled for the heirs, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) inherited for the woman of Ashim the blood money.
The Shaykh: The blood money is for the heirs, and it has no relation to whoever demanded the blood money and obtained it, whether it was the brother or someone else.
Another questioner: The 'Aqilah has to pay.
The Shaykh: Yes.
...
The Shaykh: How?
The questioner: Is the blood money considered part of the ... that the deceased leaves behind? A person was killed, and the Bedouin pay his blood money ... Is this blood money given to the heirs or to his family? Because it is a matter of vengeance, and taking vengeance is a right belonging to the family ...?
The Shaykh: Who are the family and who are the heirs?
The questioner: The family is the brother, the heirs are ... .
The Shaykh: The wife, the son, and the ... .
The questioner: The husband, because she is a woman, the husband, the son, the sister, and the mother, and she has a brother, and her brother ... took the blood money, does he take it ...?
The Shaykh: I mean, if the brother's son demands the blood money, does he take it?
The questioner: No.
The Shaykh : Then?
The questioner: The blood money.
The Shaykh: Do not rush, your example is that the brother demanded the blood money.
The questioner: He took it.
The Shaykh: He took it.
The questioner: He took it from the killer.
The Shaykh: Yes, yes, so because he is the one who demanded the blood money, it became his property?
The questioner: Of course not, from here ... .
The Shaykh : So then.
The questioner: The blood money is the same.
The Shaykh: That is why I changed your example from the brother to the brother's son, the brother's son is the one who demanded the blood money and obtained it; does he own it?
The questioner : Of course not.
The Shaykh: We will proceed step by step, so if he did not own the blood money, who will own it then?
The questioner: The heirs.
The Shaykh: There is no other way.
Another questioner: Is the blood money for the 'Aqilah as 'Umar used to say?
The Shaykh: No, my brother, the blood money is upon the 'Aqilah, his question is not about that.
Another questioner: There was 'Umar who used to say: The blood money is for the 'Aqilah, and a woman does not inherit from her husband's wealth.
Eid Abbasi: From her husband's wealth, from her husband's blood money.
Another questioner: From her husband's blood money, anything, this is what 'Umar used to issue a ruling on, then when he learned that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) inherited for the woman of Ashim al-Dabbabi from her husband's blood money, he returned and retracted that, and issued a ruling that the blood money is for the heirs, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) inherited for the woman of Ashim al-Dabbabi from her blood money.
The questioner: The blood money is for the heirs.
Another questioner: It is settled for the heirs, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) inherited for the woman of Ashim the blood money.
The Shaykh: The blood money is for the heirs, and it has no relation to whoever demanded the blood money and obtained it, whether it was the brother or someone else.
Another questioner: The 'Aqilah has to pay.
The Shaykh: Yes.
...
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
