If he said: "I have permission from the King," and he means by that Allah (Blessed and Exalted is He), for the sake of calling to Allah (the Exalted)?

The questioner: O our Shaykh, if he said "from the King."

The Shaykh : How?

Another questioner: Well done, "from the King."

The Shaykh : Yes?

Another questioner: "From the King," I sometimes say: "from the King," sometimes I say: "with me."

The Shaykh: Likewise, if he said "from the King" and nothing else, stay in your place; from what perspective? Misleading. He tells them: "from the King"; meaning the human king, the ruler.

Another questioner: It is a matter of euphemism, meaning.

The Shaykh: Yes, this is a second issue, the issue of euphemism. Is there a necessity?

The questioner: No, I say the prohibited thing is that it is a matter of euphemism.

The Shaykh: Yes, yes, yes, that is it, yes, there is a difference, of course, as you want to say, between "the One of Majesty" and "the King," yes; because "the King" is one of the names of Allah, whereas "the One of Majesty" is a title that is sometimes permissible if it is used and the intention behind it is understood, otherwise it is not.

Another questioner : May Allah reward you with good.

The Shaykh: Yes.

Another questioner : ... .

The Shaykh: If he means "chance" in the sense of no divine decree, then it is disbelief. And if he means by the word "luck" in the sense of no divine decree; likewise the word "portion," even though it is mentioned in the Qur'an, if he means no divine decree, then it is disbelief. But if he means that all of this is by the command and decree of Allah, then there is nothing wrong with it.