Reading from the words of the compiler: "And the fifth is composition from the essence of the one... to his saying... they could not have done it even if both worlds had come"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Chapter on the rulings of this composition"
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: "Chapter on the rulings of these six compositions"
The Shaykh : I think we have some remaining
The student: The remaining explanation
The student: This and how much
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: This and how much confusion
The Shaykh : The fifth we took
The student: And the sixth
The Shaykh : And the sixth we took
The student: Who said something
The Shaykh : We paused at: "Whoever said something other than this, then what *** he said is a type of the two actions"
Well, the author (may Allah have mercy on him) says "this" and I think what we read, you read it?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the fifth is composition...
The Shaykh : Did he not read it? Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"And the fifth is composition from the essence of the one *** whose attributes are by a second terminology
They called it composition, and that is their placement *** of that in custom or in the Qur'an
We do not accept a term placed *** in the terminology of the followers of the Greeks
Or from those from whom it was received, from a sect *** of the Jahmiyyah who are not known for knowledge
Who describes Him, Glorified and Exalted is He, with His exalted attributes and leaves the implication of the Qur'an
The Shaykh : The copy we have says "We do not accept a placed term ***" but the commentator says...: the correct is "We do not reject" as evidenced by his saying: "Who describes Him (Glorified and Exalted is He) with His *** exalted attributes" meaning we do not reject describing Him because of a term placed by a terminology that is not known in the Arabic language or in the language of the Qur'an, and on this basis it should be written instead of "accept" perhaps "reject," here reject, as evidenced by his saying: "Who describes Him (Glorified and Exalted is He)" yes, that is right
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : The verse says: "We do not reject a placed term ***" meaning because of a term placed by terminology, describing Him (Glorified and Exalted is He), yes, read the verses a second time "We do not reject"
The reader: "We do not reject a placed term *** in the terminology of the followers of the Greeks
Or from those from whom it was received, from a sect *** of the Jahmiyyah who are not known for knowledge
Who describes Him, Glorified and Exalted is He, with His exalted attributes and leaves the implication of the Qur'an
The Shaykh : And we leave
The reader: "Who describes Him (Glorified and Exalted is He) with His *** exalted attributes and we leave the implication of the Qur'an
And reason and innate dispositions, all of them, before corruption and the implication of proof
"Call it what you wish"
The Shaykh : The correct is the intellect, the implication of the Qur'an and the implication of the intellect "And the innate dispositions also, all of them *** before corruption and the implication of the proof"
The reader: "And the intellect and the innate dispositions also, all of them *** before corruption and the implication of the proof
Call it what you wish, for the matter is not in the *** names with titles of significance
Is there any evidence that necessitates the invalidation of this *** composition from intellect and from the Qur'an
And by Allah, if you had published your scholars, they would not have been able to handle it, even if both worlds had come
The Shaykh : And even if
The reader: "And by Allah, if you had spread your sheikhs, they would not *** have been able to do it even if both worlds had come"
"Chapter on the rulings of this composition"
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: "Chapter on the rulings of these six compositions"
The Shaykh : I think we have some remaining
The student: The remaining explanation
The student: This and how much
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: This and how much confusion
The Shaykh : The fifth we took
The student: And the sixth
The Shaykh : And the sixth we took
The student: Who said something
The Shaykh : We paused at: "Whoever said something other than this, then what *** he said is a type of the two actions"
Well, the author (may Allah have mercy on him) says "this" and I think what we read, you read it?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the fifth is composition...
The Shaykh : Did he not read it? Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"And the fifth is composition from the essence of the one *** whose attributes are by a second terminology
They called it composition, and that is their placement *** of that in custom or in the Qur'an
We do not accept a term placed *** in the terminology of the followers of the Greeks
Or from those from whom it was received, from a sect *** of the Jahmiyyah who are not known for knowledge
Who describes Him, Glorified and Exalted is He, with His exalted attributes and leaves the implication of the Qur'an
The Shaykh : The copy we have says "We do not accept a placed term ***" but the commentator says...: the correct is "We do not reject" as evidenced by his saying: "Who describes Him (Glorified and Exalted is He) with His *** exalted attributes" meaning we do not reject describing Him because of a term placed by a terminology that is not known in the Arabic language or in the language of the Qur'an, and on this basis it should be written instead of "accept" perhaps "reject," here reject, as evidenced by his saying: "Who describes Him (Glorified and Exalted is He)" yes, that is right
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : The verse says: "We do not reject a placed term ***" meaning because of a term placed by terminology, describing Him (Glorified and Exalted is He), yes, read the verses a second time "We do not reject"
The reader: "We do not reject a placed term *** in the terminology of the followers of the Greeks
Or from those from whom it was received, from a sect *** of the Jahmiyyah who are not known for knowledge
Who describes Him, Glorified and Exalted is He, with His exalted attributes and leaves the implication of the Qur'an
The Shaykh : And we leave
The reader: "Who describes Him (Glorified and Exalted is He) with His *** exalted attributes and we leave the implication of the Qur'an
And reason and innate dispositions, all of them, before corruption and the implication of proof
"Call it what you wish"
The Shaykh : The correct is the intellect, the implication of the Qur'an and the implication of the intellect "And the innate dispositions also, all of them *** before corruption and the implication of the proof"
The reader: "And the intellect and the innate dispositions also, all of them *** before corruption and the implication of the proof
Call it what you wish, for the matter is not in the *** names with titles of significance
Is there any evidence that necessitates the invalidation of this *** composition from intellect and from the Qur'an
And by Allah, if you had published your scholars, they would not have been able to handle it, even if both worlds had come
The Shaykh : And even if
The reader: "And by Allah, if you had spread your sheikhs, they would not *** have been able to do it even if both worlds had come"