The meaning of the poet's statement: "So certainty does not benefit from it, and conjecture *** is likewise negated, so both matters are negated. Why the blame when we set it aside *** and turned to reason and the thoughts of the minds"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He says:
"So certainty does not benefit from it, and conjecture *** is likewise negated, so both matters are negated"
So certainty does not benefit from it, and conjecture does not benefit from it either. If the indication is now neither certain nor conjectural, is that so? It is not established at all, and there is no indication in it of anything.
"Why the blame when we set it aside *** and turned to reason and the thoughts of the minds"
That is to say, if it does not indicate anything, why do you blame us when we say that if the texts do not indicate anything, it is obligatory to turn to reason, yes.
"So may Allah magnify your rewards in the texts, *** O nation of the athar and the Qur'an. It died"
That is to say, he consoles the nation of the Qur'an and the athar. He says: May Allah magnify your reward. The texts died, they died, because if nothing is derived from them, and they do not indicate anything in reality itself, then that is their death.
"It died among the people, they do not revive it *** ever, and it does not revive them due to their lowliness"
Yes, they do not revive it and they do not raise it, and it also does not revive them, but it humiliates them. Because whoever does not raise his head with the Qur'an, Allah does not raise him. Whoever does not raise his head with the Qur'an, Allah does not raise him. Yes, he says:
"This and their saying"
The student: That's it
The Shaykh : Is that so? Is it finished?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : ... Perhaps we did not find it
The questioner : And what is the meaning of ...
"So certainty does not benefit from it, and conjecture *** is likewise negated, so both matters are negated"
So certainty does not benefit from it, and conjecture does not benefit from it either. If the indication is now neither certain nor conjectural, is that so? It is not established at all, and there is no indication in it of anything.
"Why the blame when we set it aside *** and turned to reason and the thoughts of the minds"
That is to say, if it does not indicate anything, why do you blame us when we say that if the texts do not indicate anything, it is obligatory to turn to reason, yes.
"So may Allah magnify your rewards in the texts, *** O nation of the athar and the Qur'an. It died"
That is to say, he consoles the nation of the Qur'an and the athar. He says: May Allah magnify your reward. The texts died, they died, because if nothing is derived from them, and they do not indicate anything in reality itself, then that is their death.
"It died among the people, they do not revive it *** ever, and it does not revive them due to their lowliness"
Yes, they do not revive it and they do not raise it, and it also does not revive them, but it humiliates them. Because whoever does not raise his head with the Qur'an, Allah does not raise him. Whoever does not raise his head with the Qur'an, Allah does not raise him. Yes, he says:
"This and their saying"
The student: That's it
The Shaykh : Is that so? Is it finished?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : ... Perhaps we did not find it
The questioner : And what is the meaning of ...