(Continuation of the response to the doubt of the people of innovation that the words are transmitted by isolated reports) And the disagreement regarding the conditions of that word, not*** in its establishment, on which two men have not differed, and if
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :" The Disposer of the worlds
There is no ambiguity in it, nor is it misleading*** nor is it a metaphor, nor does it have two meanings"
This is agreed upon. So when you confuse the common people and say: Is Allah Arabic or Syriac? Is it derived or non-derived? Is it transmitted or improvised? Yes, what do you want with this? Deception. As for the intended meaning, the people of intellect agree that the intended meaning is the Lord of the worlds.
" And the disagreement regarding the conditions of that word *** not in its establishment, on which two men have not differed "
The disagreement they mentioned returns to the word in the conditions of the word: Is it Syriac or Arabic? Yes. As for who established it here? Is there disagreement or not? There is no disagreement. For this reason he said: not in its establishment, on which two men have not differed.
" And if they differed on the word Makkah *** there are two known opinions for them
Did they not make it clear that the later generations *** intended by this that the deity of the divine and the qiblah of the lands are
Meaning: People also differed on the word Makkah, why was it named Makkah? And sometimes it is called Bakkah, and Allah named it in the Qur'an with both names, Bakkah and Makkah. But this disagreement that occurred, did people differ on the intended meaning? Here?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : No, for this reason he said " Do they clarify their disagreement by saying that their intended meaning *** is the sanctuary of the deity and the qiblah of the lands "
And what is the answer? No.
There is no ambiguity in it, nor is it misleading*** nor is it a metaphor, nor does it have two meanings"
This is agreed upon. So when you confuse the common people and say: Is Allah Arabic or Syriac? Is it derived or non-derived? Is it transmitted or improvised? Yes, what do you want with this? Deception. As for the intended meaning, the people of intellect agree that the intended meaning is the Lord of the worlds.
" And the disagreement regarding the conditions of that word *** not in its establishment, on which two men have not differed "
The disagreement they mentioned returns to the word in the conditions of the word: Is it Syriac or Arabic? Yes. As for who established it here? Is there disagreement or not? There is no disagreement. For this reason he said: not in its establishment, on which two men have not differed.
" And if they differed on the word Makkah *** there are two known opinions for them
Did they not make it clear that the later generations *** intended by this that the deity of the divine and the qiblah of the lands are
Meaning: People also differed on the word Makkah, why was it named Makkah? And sometimes it is called Bakkah, and Allah named it in the Qur'an with both names, Bakkah and Makkah. But this disagreement that occurred, did people differ on the intended meaning? Here?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : No, for this reason he said " Do they clarify their disagreement by saying that their intended meaning *** is the sanctuary of the deity and the qiblah of the lands "
And what is the answer? No.