Continuation of the hadith on what the person in ihram must not wear.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Now, he must not wear trousers either, and this is well known. It was previously mentioned that Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) used to grant a dispensation for wearing the taban, which is a short pair of trousers. The correct view is that this is not permissible. The reasoning behind Aisha’s position is that these are not called trousers, but the apparent meaning of the text is general, and there is no difference between a short-sleeved or long-sleeved garment. The baranis are loose garments that have something attached to them to cover the head. They were specifically mentioned because they are not called a qamis (shirt), so they were specified to prevent confusion. Now, what about the mashlah? Does it resemble the qamis or the baranis? It appears to be closer to the baranis. However, if he turns the mashlah inside out and wraps himself in it, there is no harm, because he is not considered to be wearing it. It is well known. Sunan al-Bayhaqi 4:420 The lam in the phrase "let him wear" indicates permissibility, because it is in contrast to the prohibition. Otherwise, it is not obligatory for the person in ihram to wear sandals or leather socks. But when the prohibition of leather socks was mentioned, permissibility was mentioned for this specific case. And His saying: "Whoever does not find two sandals" means he does not find them, or he does not find their price. He may find sandals in the markets near the person in ihram, but he does not have the price for them, so he is considered not to have found them. Or he has the price but did not find anything at the miqat, so let him wear the leather socks. He said: "And let him cut them below the ankles." The lam in "let him cut them"—O 'Abd Allah, where did you go?
The questioner : For the command.
The Shaykh : Where did you go regarding the lam in the command?! The lam in "let him cut them" is for the command, and this command is for obligation. It is not like the command in "let him wear." The command in "let him wear" is for what, O 'Abd Allah? And "let him cut" is for obligation. If someone asks: Why do you not make it for other than obligation? We say: Because cutting them is a destruction of them, and the destruction of wealth is forbidden. And the person in ihram cannot violate the prohibition except by what? Except by an obligation. Based on this principle, some scholars argued for the obligation of circumcision using this principle. They said: The original ruling is that cutting something from a human being is what? Forbidden. So the person in ihram is not permitted to do it except by an obligation in all cases. This is a sound principle. "And let him cut them below the ankles" because if he cuts them below the ankles, they are not leather socks in the absolute sense, meaning they are not called leather socks, but rather cut leather socks.
Nor the baranis
ولا البرانسNor the leather socks
ولا الخفافExcept one who does not find two sandals, let him wear the leather socks
إلا أحد لا يجد نعلين فليلبس الخفينThe questioner : For the command.
The Shaykh : Where did you go regarding the lam in the command?! The lam in "let him cut them" is for the command, and this command is for obligation. It is not like the command in "let him wear." The command in "let him wear" is for what, O 'Abd Allah? And "let him cut" is for obligation. If someone asks: Why do you not make it for other than obligation? We say: Because cutting them is a destruction of them, and the destruction of wealth is forbidden. And the person in ihram cannot violate the prohibition except by what? Except by an obligation. Based on this principle, some scholars argued for the obligation of circumcision using this principle. They said: The original ruling is that cutting something from a human being is what? Forbidden. So the person in ihram is not permitted to do it except by an obligation in all cases. This is a sound principle. "And let him cut them below the ankles" because if he cuts them below the ankles, they are not leather socks in the absolute sense, meaning they are not called leather socks, but rather cut leather socks.