. . For hunting or a livestock dog, his reward is diminished by two qirats every day. The Shaykh
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: Sahih al-Bukhari 5481
The Shaykh : But regarding the Arabic grammar rules you have, the most correct is yes, because it says "whoever keeps a dog, except a dog," which necessitates the accusative case. So look at what follows: "or a livestock dog" is in the accusative case, yes? It has no basis for the nominative case. Therefore, it appears to me that the manuscript is incorrect. It is written "except a hunting dog," and it is marked as correct. Did you not speak about it in the explanation?
for hunting, nor for guarding livestock, the reward (for his good deeds) will be reduced by two Qirats per day.
.. لصيد أو كلب ماشية فإنه ينقص من أجره كل يوم قيراطانThe Shaykh : But regarding the Arabic grammar rules you have, the most correct is yes, because it says "whoever keeps a dog, except a dog," which necessitates the accusative case. So look at what follows: "or a livestock dog" is in the accusative case, yes? It has no basis for the nominative case. Therefore, it appears to me that the manuscript is incorrect. It is written "except a hunting dog," and it is marked as correct. Did you not speak about it in the explanation?