Benefits of the Hadith: (… from Ikrimah that Rafi' divorced his wife, and 'Abd al-Rahman ibn al-Zubayr al-Qurazi married her. Aisha said:
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : It contains issues that require consideration. First: What is the cause of the greenness on her skin?
The students: The beating.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: The beating.
The Shaykh : It appears to be the beating, and that this greenness is not from the khimar she is wearing, is that right with you?
"The reading is from Irsad al-Sari by al-Qastallani"
The student: "And she showed him the greenness on her skin" is from the effect of his beating her, and in it is a shift or a bare form.
The Shaykh : Yes, good. And in it is also evidence for the permissibility of a woman demanding annulment if the husband is unable to have intercourse. The point is that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not rebuke her for that, but because she was divorced from a previous husband, he said that she is not lawful to him, meaning to the first one, until she tastes the sweetness of the second and he tastes her sweetness.
And in it is evidence that if the claimant is denied by the one against whom the claim is made, his statement is not established. Because the man denied it and said, "I am able to have intercourse and I shake her off like one shakes off a hide," and the Messenger (may Allah's prayer and peace be upon him) also used this as evidence to believe his statement. By whom?
The questioner : The two sons.
The Shaykh : By the two sons. And in it is evidence for the permissibility of a plural pronoun referring back to a dual, due to the saying of the Messenger (may Allah's prayer and peace be upon him): and his saying: Sahih al-Bukhari 5825 and he did not say: "to them" and he did not say: "these are your two sons."
Yes, look at the husband's answer: "By Allah, I do shake her off like one shakes off a hide" but she is defiant. Look at the summary? Al-Qastallani.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes?
The reader: He says: "I do shake her off like one shakes off a hide", meaning: like shaking a hide, and it is an allusion to the perfection of the strength of intercourse, but she is defiant: with the deletion of the taa, like a menstruating woman, because it is one of the characteristics of women, so there is no need for the distinguishing taa "she wants Rafi'". Complete?
The Shaykh : No.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Huh? Is it like that with you? Good, he says: but she is defiant, he did not say defiant (with taa), he said because defiance is specific to women, but in this there is a consideration because defiance occurs in men and women, Allah the Exalted said:[An-Nisa 4:128] But we say that the taa was deleted here due to the indication of the first pronoun to it, which is "but she is defiant." Good. Yes. Ahmad?
The students: The beating.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: The beating.
The Shaykh : It appears to be the beating, and that this greenness is not from the khimar she is wearing, is that right with you?
"The reading is from Irsad al-Sari by al-Qastallani"
The student: "And she showed him the greenness on her skin" is from the effect of his beating her, and in it is a shift or a bare form.
The Shaykh : Yes, good. And in it is also evidence for the permissibility of a woman demanding annulment if the husband is unable to have intercourse. The point is that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not rebuke her for that, but because she was divorced from a previous husband, he said that she is not lawful to him, meaning to the first one, until she tastes the sweetness of the second and he tastes her sweetness.
And in it is evidence that if the claimant is denied by the one against whom the claim is made, his statement is not established. Because the man denied it and said, "I am able to have intercourse and I shake her off like one shakes off a hide," and the Messenger (may Allah's prayer and peace be upon him) also used this as evidence to believe his statement. By whom?
The questioner : The two sons.
The Shaykh : By the two sons. And in it is evidence for the permissibility of a plural pronoun referring back to a dual, due to the saying of the Messenger (may Allah's prayer and peace be upon him):
Are these your sons?
بنوك هؤلاء؟But by Allah, these boys resemble him
فوالله لهم أشبه بهYes, look at the husband's answer: "By Allah, I do shake her off like one shakes off a hide" but she is defiant. Look at the summary? Al-Qastallani.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes?
The reader: He says: "I do shake her off like one shakes off a hide", meaning: like shaking a hide, and it is an allusion to the perfection of the strength of intercourse, but she is defiant: with the deletion of the taa, like a menstruating woman, because it is one of the characteristics of women, so there is no need for the distinguishing taa "she wants Rafi'". Complete?
The Shaykh : No.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Huh? Is it like that with you? Good, he says: but she is defiant, he did not say defiant (with taa), he said because defiance is specific to women, but in this there is a consideration because defiance occurs in men and women, Allah the Exalted said: