Why do we not say: that treating itching with synthetic silk is preferable to natural silk?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : O Shaykh, we said... if... if... in the case of synthetic silk... it is permissible for him to wear the original silk, O Shaykh. We did not tell him to wear the synthetic one as it is better.
The Shaykh : And what is it?
The questioner : ... leads to.
The Shaykh : What is it?
The questioner : We said.
The Shaykh : Itching, you mean?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, no, it may not lead to that. It appears that it has the property of silk.
The questioner : ... that it leads to it, if it leads to it...
The Shaykh : No, it is not obligatory, it is not obligatory, as long as the Lawgiver has made it permissible, just as we said regarding what is permissible out of need, because if we say that it is a condition that there is no other alternative, it becomes a dire necessity.
The questioner : ... the need, the need now... .
The Shaykh : No, the need is not forbidden; the need is the lowest level of necessity for him. Yes.
The reader: Abu al-Yaman narrated to us. He said: Shu'ayb informed us...
The Shaykh : And what is it?
The questioner : ... leads to.
The Shaykh : What is it?
The questioner : We said.
The Shaykh : Itching, you mean?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, no, it may not lead to that. It appears that it has the property of silk.
The questioner : ... that it leads to it, if it leads to it...
The Shaykh : No, it is not obligatory, it is not obligatory, as long as the Lawgiver has made it permissible, just as we said regarding what is permissible out of need, because if we say that it is a condition that there is no other alternative, it becomes a dire necessity.
The questioner : ... the need, the need now... .
The Shaykh : No, the need is not forbidden; the need is the lowest level of necessity for him. Yes.
The reader: Abu al-Yaman narrated to us. He said: Shu'ayb informed us...