Is it understood from the previous hadiths that a woman does not adorn herself for her husband at all, because it is a change of Allah's creation?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Some women, O Shaykh, understood from this hadith that was mentioned earlier, "The women who file their teeth for beauty, they do not adorn themselves at all for the husband."
The Shaykh : Which one?
The questioner : I say, some...
The Shaykh : Where is the hadith? Where is the hadith?
The questioner : The hadith that was mentioned earlier. ... the husband to the end, "The women who file their teeth for beauty, who change the creation of Allah the Exalted."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Some women understood this hadith to mean that they do not adorn themselves at all for the man; she only sees that she should bathe with water and soap, saying this is the only adornment.
The Shaykh : No, no, that is not what is taken from it. This involves changing the creation of Allah, Mighty and Majestic. These things involve changing the creation of Allah, Mighty and Majestic, and turning away from Allah, Mighty and Majestic.
The questioner : Shaykh? Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Shaykh.
The Shaykh : We took three.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Three.
The questioner : There are many hadiths, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : On ... .
The Shaykh : It does not contradict; the discussion is about the pause. Yes.
The questioner : ... explain this issue ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : I mean, his intention is, does the one who puts on things, does this fall under changing the creation or not?
Another questioner: The powders.
The Shaykh : No, no, it is not about the powders.
The questioner : And what is the basis for this statement, I mean?
The Shaykh : He is not asking about this; he is asking about adorning oneself with clothes and the like.
The questioner : No, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : ... these women mean, absolutely, even powder and such, or something moderate on the face that they put on ..
The Shaykh : No, no, this is a mistake, this is not correct, because what does not remain is permissible. The women used to apply kohl in the time of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and the scholars also mentioned the dyeing of a woman's hair and her adorning herself for her husband. So, what is not permanent does not fall under this hadith. Powder disappears, kohl disappears, reddening the lips disappears, so it is of the same kind as henna. Henna can be more lasting, remaining for a period.
The questioner : ... O Shaykh ... the girls now.
The Shaykh : No, that is a mistake.
The questioner : ... the women.
The Shaykh : They do not obey them, even if they say they are not ... . When a woman marries, she wants to adorn herself for her husband ... . Yes.
The Shaykh : Which one?
The questioner : I say, some...
The Shaykh : Where is the hadith? Where is the hadith?
The questioner : The hadith that was mentioned earlier. ... the husband to the end, "The women who file their teeth for beauty, who change the creation of Allah the Exalted."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Some women understood this hadith to mean that they do not adorn themselves at all for the man; she only sees that she should bathe with water and soap, saying this is the only adornment.
The Shaykh : No, no, that is not what is taken from it. This involves changing the creation of Allah, Mighty and Majestic. These things involve changing the creation of Allah, Mighty and Majestic, and turning away from Allah, Mighty and Majestic.
The questioner : Shaykh? Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Shaykh.
The Shaykh : We took three.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Three.
The questioner : There are many hadiths, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : On ... .
The Shaykh : It does not contradict; the discussion is about the pause. Yes.
The questioner : ... explain this issue ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : I mean, his intention is, does the one who puts on things, does this fall under changing the creation or not?
Another questioner: The powders.
The Shaykh : No, no, it is not about the powders.
The questioner : And what is the basis for this statement, I mean?
The Shaykh : He is not asking about this; he is asking about adorning oneself with clothes and the like.
The questioner : No, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : ... these women mean, absolutely, even powder and such, or something moderate on the face that they put on ..
The Shaykh : No, no, this is a mistake, this is not correct, because what does not remain is permissible. The women used to apply kohl in the time of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and the scholars also mentioned the dyeing of a woman's hair and her adorning herself for her husband. So, what is not permanent does not fall under this hadith. Powder disappears, kohl disappears, reddening the lips disappears, so it is of the same kind as henna. Henna can be more lasting, remaining for a period.
The questioner : ... O Shaykh ... the girls now.
The Shaykh : No, that is a mistake.
The questioner : ... the women.
The Shaykh : They do not obey them, even if they say they are not ... . When a woman marries, she wants to adorn herself for her husband ... . Yes.