Does this hadith include a woman if she is attributed to her husband?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : If a woman is attributed to her husband, does she fall under this hadith?
The Shaykh : Yes, she falls under the hadith.
The questioner : Is her father known?
The Shaykh : Even if he is known, why does she not attribute herself to him?
The questioner : From the perspective of ...
The Shaykh : It is never permissible. Even if they are related to him, it should be said that the marriage contract must be annulled. Because a daughter is not lawful for her father.
The questioner : The intended meaning is from the perspective of fame ...
The Shaykh : This is not correct: So-and-so is the daughter of So-and-so, and he is her husband.
The questioner : So-and-so is of the family of So-and-so?
The Shaykh : Well, that does not contradict it. So-and-so is of the family of So-and-so, meaning the husband. Well, is this permissible?
We say: Now you have acknowledged that this is your father, so we will annul the marriage, or not?
The student: The Westerners do this.
The Shaykh : Well, the Westerners? Do we follow the Westerners in something that contradicts the Shari'ah? We do not follow the disbelieving Westerners, nor those who do not contradict the Shari'ah, so how can we follow those who contradict the Shari'ah?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : No, it is never ... it does not contradict: I say So-and-so is the daughter of So-and-so, the wife of So-and-so.
The questioner : No, they do not accept it, O Shaykh. He says: So-and-so, the name of her husband ...
The Shaykh : This is a sin.
The student: May Allah reward you. In the Levant, when a woman marries, she is immediately attributed to her husband, and it is said So-and-so is Jabir, So-and-so is such-and-such.
The Shaykh : This is not permissible; this contradicts the Shari'ah.
The Shaykh : Yes, she falls under the hadith.
The questioner : Is her father known?
The Shaykh : Even if he is known, why does she not attribute herself to him?
The questioner : From the perspective of ...
The Shaykh : It is never permissible. Even if they are related to him, it should be said that the marriage contract must be annulled. Because a daughter is not lawful for her father.
The questioner : The intended meaning is from the perspective of fame ...
The Shaykh : This is not correct: So-and-so is the daughter of So-and-so, and he is her husband.
The questioner : So-and-so is of the family of So-and-so?
The Shaykh : Well, that does not contradict it. So-and-so is of the family of So-and-so, meaning the husband. Well, is this permissible?
We say: Now you have acknowledged that this is your father, so we will annul the marriage, or not?
The student: The Westerners do this.
The Shaykh : Well, the Westerners? Do we follow the Westerners in something that contradicts the Shari'ah? We do not follow the disbelieving Westerners, nor those who do not contradict the Shari'ah, so how can we follow those who contradict the Shari'ah?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : No, it is never ... it does not contradict: I say So-and-so is the daughter of So-and-so, the wife of So-and-so.
The questioner : No, they do not accept it, O Shaykh. He says: So-and-so, the name of her husband ...
The Shaykh : This is a sin.
The student: May Allah reward you. In the Levant, when a woman marries, she is immediately attributed to her husband, and it is said So-and-so is Jabir, So-and-so is such-and-such.
The Shaykh : This is not permissible; this contradicts the Shari'ah.