Why is the one worshipped other than Allah called a taghiyyah?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : I mentioned taghiyyah, which is a stone that people use for no benefit. Why is it called taghiyyah...?
The Shaykh : Every object of worship other than Allah is a taghiyyah, considering the doer. Yes, that is it. They transgressed with it. Taghiyyah is a verbal noun; what is the active participle? Yes.
The questioner : ... Ibn Kathir in al-Bidaya wa al-Nihayah ... .
The Shaykh : No, this is not correct. This is not correct, because it is established in the authentic hadith that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said: It is also established with no doubt that no one was sent from the Arabs except Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) [Al-Baqarah 2:129] There is no prophet between him and Isa. They mentioned three, one of whom was Khalid ibn Sinan, and the second I forgot, by Allah, three, and none of them are correct.
The questioner : Ibn Kathir cited a hadith as evidence and graded it weak...
The Shaykh : Perhaps May Allah guide him, or that he was worshipping Allah (Mighty and Majestic)... This is a karamah (a miracle granted to a righteous person), extinguishing the fire. If it is established, that is fine. We now have three: from worshipping other than Allah, circumambulating graves, and others.
We say that Shaytan (Satan) despaired when he witnessed the great conquest, but this does not mean that it will not occur. He despaired when he saw the conquest, but something may still occur, even though he despaired of it, because this does not contain the statement that Allah said it is impossible for shirk (associating partners with Allah) to occur in the Arabian Peninsula. Good.
The Shaykh : Every object of worship other than Allah is a taghiyyah, considering the doer. Yes, that is it. They transgressed with it. Taghiyyah is a verbal noun; what is the active participle? Yes.
The questioner : ... Ibn Kathir in al-Bidaya wa al-Nihayah ... .
The Shaykh : No, this is not correct. This is not correct, because it is established in the authentic hadith that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said:
There is no prophet between him and Isa
ليس بينه وبين عيسى نبيOur Lord, and send among them a messenger
ربنا وابعث فيهم رسولاThe questioner : Ibn Kathir cited a hadith as evidence and graded it weak...
The Shaykh : Perhaps May Allah guide him, or that he was worshipping Allah (Mighty and Majestic)... This is a karamah (a miracle granted to a righteous person), extinguishing the fire. If it is established, that is fine. We now have three: from worshipping other than Allah, circumambulating graves, and others.
We say that Shaytan (Satan) despaired when he witnessed the great conquest, but this does not mean that it will not occur. He despaired when he saw the conquest, but something may still occur, even though he despaired of it, because this does not contain the statement that Allah said it is impossible for shirk (associating partners with Allah) to occur in the Arabian Peninsula. Good.