Can it be said that the narrations varied in some of them without "and his father"? What is the stronger position?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : ... the variation in the narrations ... without this wording.
The Shaykh : That is, by omitting it. If it is omitted, there is no problem. In that case, one looks at who is more trustworthy among those who included it or those who omitted it. If the one who included it is more trustworthy, then it is necessary to follow it. If the one who omitted it is more trustworthy, then this becomes an anomalous narration. And I see that the stronger position is that it is a clear, decisive verse and an ambiguous verse.
The Shaykh : That is, by omitting it. If it is omitted, there is no problem. In that case, one looks at who is more trustworthy among those who included it or those who omitted it. If the one who included it is more trustworthy, then it is necessary to follow it. If the one who omitted it is more trustworthy, then this becomes an anomalous narration. And I see that the stronger position is that it is a clear, decisive verse and an ambiguous verse.