Should we not qualify the impurity as the lightened type?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : May Allah reward you, O Shaykh... regarding the boy, we do not qualify the impurity...
The Shaykh : That is, it is the lightened type, yes. For this reason, sprinkling water is sufficient for it. The lightened impurity is the urine of a boy, subject to the conditions we mentioned, and also pre-seminal fluid. The heavy impurity will come, if Allah wills, in the case of the dog's impurity.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Sprinkling water...
The Shaykh : ...
The student: The time is up.
The Shaykh : Is the time up? How?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: He says at the beginning of the speech, regarding the permissibility of distinguishing in the mention of urine, based on the statement: "sprinkle from the urine of a girl" and "sprinkle from the urine of a boy." Many people, when they want to express the act of urination, say: "I want to relieve myself," which is fine, or "I want to expel the water" or "the drink."
The Shaykh : How is there no harm?
The student: This is a phrase, O Shaykh. "I want to relieve myself" is not part of the explanation; rather, it is a statement by one of the students. It appears that the brother Ahmad added it, and then you said, "O Shaykh, there is no harm."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Shaykh, you were explaining and mentioning that some people say, "I want to expel the water."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... I relieve myself.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: So you said, "I relieve myself, there is no harm," whereas "I expel the water" is...
The Shaykh : That is, this is like that.
The student: This is not included in the speech. The intended meaning is "I want to expel the water."
The Shaykh : ...
The student: Some people say, "I want to expel the water" or "the drink."
The Shaykh : Yes, or "I relieve myself," this...
The student: ...
The Shaykh : It is not included. Okay, cross it out.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : That is, "I relieve myself."
The Shaykh : That is, it is the lightened type, yes. For this reason, sprinkling water is sufficient for it. The lightened impurity is the urine of a boy, subject to the conditions we mentioned, and also pre-seminal fluid. The heavy impurity will come, if Allah wills, in the case of the dog's impurity.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Sprinkling water...
The Shaykh : ...
The student: The time is up.
The Shaykh : Is the time up? How?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: He says at the beginning of the speech, regarding the permissibility of distinguishing in the mention of urine, based on the statement: "sprinkle from the urine of a girl" and "sprinkle from the urine of a boy." Many people, when they want to express the act of urination, say: "I want to relieve myself," which is fine, or "I want to expel the water" or "the drink."
The Shaykh : How is there no harm?
The student: This is a phrase, O Shaykh. "I want to relieve myself" is not part of the explanation; rather, it is a statement by one of the students. It appears that the brother Ahmad added it, and then you said, "O Shaykh, there is no harm."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Shaykh, you were explaining and mentioning that some people say, "I want to expel the water."
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ... I relieve myself.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: So you said, "I relieve myself, there is no harm," whereas "I expel the water" is...
The Shaykh : That is, this is like that.
The student: This is not included in the speech. The intended meaning is "I want to expel the water."
The Shaykh : ...
The student: Some people say, "I want to expel the water" or "the drink."
The Shaykh : Yes, or "I relieve myself," this...
The student: ...
The Shaykh : It is not included. Okay, cross it out.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : That is, "I relieve myself."