The hadith (If a slave runs away, his prayer is not accepted) and the hadith (Whoever talks nonsense has no Jumu'ah for him): which of the two categories does this fall under regarding the issue of acceptance and non-acceptance?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : His prayer is not accepted, and likewise the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him): Musannaf Abd al-Razzaq 4:271.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Which of the two categories?
The Shaykh : As for the first, the point is that he has no prayer because he has usurped time. For this reason, we say that the obligatory prayer of the runaway slave is valid, because the obligatory prayer is excluded from the master's right. As for, this negation is a negation of reward, meaning that he is deprived of the reward of Jumu'ah, but it is not obligatory for him, nor is he required to repeat it.
The questioner : It is not the meaning of our statement that his sin encompassed the worship...
The Shaykh : Which one? No, not with regard to the slave, because the slave does not have the right to perform voluntary prayers without his master's permission. Likewise, with regard to...
The questioner : And the fortune-teller.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : We say regarding the fortune-teller that he has no excuse.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : He has no excuse.
The Shaykh : Yes, we say: the sin of visiting the fortune-teller nullified the good deed of performing the prayer. What is it?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : What do you mean?
The questioner : Whatever comes out of the anus invalidates the wudu, and this is its point.
The Shaykh : That is, anything that is this wind, and it is pure and has no substance, invalidates the wudu. So what is impure and has substance is all the more so. And may Allah send prayers and blessings upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and his Companions, and those who follow them with excellence until the Day of Resurrection.
And whoever chatters has no Friday prayer for him.
ومن لغا فلا جمعة لهThe Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Which of the two categories?
The Shaykh : As for the first, the point is that he has no prayer because he has usurped time. For this reason, we say that the obligatory prayer of the runaway slave is valid, because the obligatory prayer is excluded from the master's right. As for
He has no Jumu'ah
فلا جمعة لهThe questioner : It is not the meaning of our statement that his sin encompassed the worship...
The Shaykh : Which one? No, not with regard to the slave, because the slave does not have the right to perform voluntary prayers without his master's permission. Likewise, with regard to...
The questioner : And the fortune-teller.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : We say regarding the fortune-teller that he has no excuse.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : He has no excuse.
The Shaykh : Yes, we say: the sin of visiting the fortune-teller nullified the good deed of performing the prayer. What is it?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : What do you mean?
The questioner : Whatever comes out of the anus invalidates the wudu, and this is its point.
The Shaykh : That is, anything that is this wind, and it is pure and has no substance, invalidates the wudu. So what is impure and has substance is all the more so. And may Allah send prayers and blessings upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and his Companions, and those who follow them with excellence until the Day of Resurrection.