Continuation of the explanation of the saying of Allah the Exalted: << So We took each of them by their sin; so from among them was he upon whom We sent a hail of stones, and from among them was he whom the Shriek took, and from among them was he whom We caused the earth to swallow up

This is when He denied that they wronged them, He clarified from where this wronging occurred, so He said: themselves is the khabar (predicate) of and the waw is its ism (subject),
The student: ... object of .. they were wronging themselves

The Shaykh : No, the ism of is the waw, they were, okay, if it were for emphasis it would be raised or accusative.
The student: Accusative by from the chapter of engagement (ishtighal).

The Shaykh : From the chapter of engagement? What do you say now, do you agree, Ibrahim?
The student: ... the khabar is the sentence

The Shaykh : The discussion is on what do we say about it? We say .. from the chapter of engagement?
The student: No .. there is no pronoun ...

The Shaykh : Then it is an object placed before and there is no engagement because engagement, Ibn Malik says:
If a hidden pronoun of a preceding name engaged the verb with its own word or place
Engagement must have a pronoun in the engaged verb, and for this we named it engagement. But here, is an object placed before and its placement before it has two benefits: a linguistic benefit and a semantic benefit: the linguistic benefit is considering the rhymes, meaning the ends of these verses, this is a linguistic benefit; if he said: "But they were wronging themselves," it would not harmonize with what came before and after it. And the second is the semantic benefit: restriction and specification, meaning they did not wrong anyone but themselves. Yes, so in reality they are the ones who wronged, but as He the Exalted said in another verse: As for Us, We did not wrong them. Yes.
The student: O Shaykh, the estimation .. in the people of Noah, meaning he made the context this ... what was not mentioned in the story of Noah ..

The Shaykh : Yes, and what is in it?
The student: So from among them means from the mentioned ones: 'Ad and those before them, Qarun, Pharaoh, and Haman, these are the ones who were mentioned, so every one of the mentioned ones We took by their sin, so from among them is in order, meaning in the order of mentioning the people of Noah now has a face...

The Shaykh : It does not matter, meaning in any case, from the people, meaning you want to say: the pronoun is for the nearest mentioned.

The questioner : Yes, and its order is a sequence, the order of the Qur'an mentioned the punishment in sequence according to the type of punishment

The Shaykh : And for those whom the Shriek took, we say like Thamud, it is not in this order because Shu'ayb was before these.
The student: .. the Shriek is suitable for Shu'ayb, for the people of Shu'ayb, Madyan.

The Shaykh : If we consider the order, it is not suitable here for Thamud, right? Or is it suitable because it is before Qarun, so from among them was he whom the Shriek took, and from among them, especially since the author says: from the mentioned ones, if he said "so every one of the sinners," in any case the issue is simple as long as there is an example for this and this.
I think on ? The last thing we wrote from the benefits?
The student: ....

The Shaykh : Did we not take benefits? What do you have, you who write? ... ? Did we mention in it the establishment of the cause?
The student: Yes, we mentioned .......

The Shaykh : Then on his saying: Okay