Exegesis of the verse: “And let those fear who, if they were to leave behind them weak offspring of whom they are afraid, so let them fear Allah and say a just word.”

Then Allah, Mighty and Majestic, said: The lam in His saying: is the lam of command, and the verb is in the jussive mood due to it by the deletion of the alif, and the original form of “yakhsha” is with an alif, and the lam was made sukun. Why is the lam of command here? It occurred after... Yes, and the lam of command is made sukun when it occurs after the waw, the fa, and thumma. Allah the Exalted said: And Allah the Exalted said: Unlike the lam of purpose, which is kasrah even if it occurs after the waw, thumma, or the fa, such as His saying, the Exalted: You do not read it as “wa liyamtai'u” unless it is established that there is a reading with the lam in sukun, in which case the lam is the lam of command and not the lam of purpose. And His saying: “law” here is conditional, its conditional verb is and its response is Here, the noble verse departed from the most common form in the response to “law”. What is the most common in the response to “law” if it is affirmative? That the lam is attached to it, so it is said: If Zayd came, 'Amr would come; if they left behind them weak offspring, they would fear for them. But the lam is sometimes deleted in the response to “law” in the affirmative, and this verse is an example of that, as is His saying, the Exalted: And in the same context, He said regarding the plant: As for when the response to law is negative with ma, the most eloquent is not to mention the lam. So if you say: If Zayd came, I said nothing, this is more eloquent than saying: I would not have said anything. But the lam may be attached to the negative ma in the response to law, as in the saying of the poet:
And if we were given the choice, we would not have parted, but there is no choice with the passing of days.
What is the conditional verb in “law”? And its response? And to complete the benefit, “law” comes in several forms. This is one where it is conditional, and the second? That it be nominal (masdariyyah), that it be nominal as in His saying, the Exalted: meaning they wished to be soft with you, so they would be soft. And if it comes as conditional, is it a jussive particle? No, it is among the non-jussive conditional particles. And His saying, the Exalted: This is a command to fear Allah, confirming the command to be afraid in His saying: Allah, Mighty and Majestic, says, reminding those who consume the wealth of orphans and waste it, He says: Let them fear, the fear being the most intense fear, and it does not occur except with knowledge, due to His saying, the Exalted: So He says, let those fear who, if they were to leave behind them weak offspring, and the doer and the object of are omitted, meaning let them fear that they would waste the wealth of orphans and consume it. And His saying: The offspring are the children, from sons and daughters, and the sons of sons, and the sons of the sons of sons. As for the daughters' children and the daughters' daughters' children and the sons of the daughters' children, they are not included in the offspring. This is the well-known view among the scholars. If someone were to say: This is a waqf (endowment) for my offspring, would the daughters' children not be included in this waqf?