Reading from the author's text with commentary and collation of manuscripts: "But the sins of the dhimmi are of two types: the first is
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: In *Iqtida' al-Sirat al-Mustaqim* "But the sins of the dhimmi are of two types, the first is"
The Shaykh : But, but
The reader: "But the sins of the dhimmi are of two types"
The Shaykh : The dhimmi
The reader: The dhimmi
The Shaykh : Ah?
The reader: The dhimmi
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: Two types
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: "The first is what the dhimmi contract necessitated acknowledging him for, and the second is what the dhimmi contract necessitated preventing him from, or from displaying it
As for the second type, there is no doubt that it is not permissible, according to our school, to rent to him or trade with him, if it is the predominant opinion that he will do so like a Muslim, and even more so. As for the first type, it is as Ibn Abi Musa said: 'It is disliked but not forbidden'; because we have acknowledged him for it, and helping him to reside in this house is like helping him to reside in the abode of Islam. If this were of the forbidden assistance, it would not have been permissible to acknowledge them for the jizyah. It is only disliked because it is assistance without benefit, since it is possible to sell it to a Muslim, unlike the acknowledgment of the jizyah, which was permissible for the sake of benefit. And upon"
The Shaykh : But selling it to the usurper who is considered an enemy is not like selling it to the dhimmi; rather, it is more severe and greater that it be sold, because if it is sold to the usurper who is considered an enemy, this means that this warring usurper will reside among us and corrupt more than he benefits, if he benefits at all. Yes.
The Shaykh : But, but
The reader: "But the sins of the dhimmi are of two types"
The Shaykh : The dhimmi
The reader: The dhimmi
The Shaykh : Ah?
The reader: The dhimmi
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: Two types
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: "The first is what the dhimmi contract necessitated acknowledging him for, and the second is what the dhimmi contract necessitated preventing him from, or from displaying it
As for the second type, there is no doubt that it is not permissible, according to our school, to rent to him or trade with him, if it is the predominant opinion that he will do so like a Muslim, and even more so. As for the first type, it is as Ibn Abi Musa said: 'It is disliked but not forbidden'; because we have acknowledged him for it, and helping him to reside in this house is like helping him to reside in the abode of Islam. If this were of the forbidden assistance, it would not have been permissible to acknowledge them for the jizyah. It is only disliked because it is assistance without benefit, since it is possible to sell it to a Muslim, unlike the acknowledgment of the jizyah, which was permissible for the sake of benefit. And upon"
The Shaykh : But selling it to the usurper who is considered an enemy is not like selling it to the dhimmi; rather, it is more severe and greater that it be sold, because if it is sold to the usurper who is considered an enemy, this means that this warring usurper will reside among us and corrupt more than he benefits, if he benefits at all. Yes.