Explanation of the author's statement: The twenty-first: That the practice of the People of the Book is blameworthy, just as the practice of the polytheists is.

The reader: "The twenty-first: That the practice of the People of the Book is blameworthy, just as the practice of the polytheists is".

The Shaykh : Where do we take it from? .
The student: ... .

The Shaykh : No, we take it from the hadith, otherwise it is known that it is currently invalid, like...
The reader: "The twenty-second: That one who has moved away from falsehood that his heart has become accustomed to cannot be guaranteed that there is no remainder of that habit in his heart, due to their saying:

And we are recent in our disbelief

ونحن حدثاء عهد بكفر

".

The Shaykh : And this is correct. It is correct that when a person moves away from something, whether it is falsehood or not, one cannot be guaranteed that there is no remainder of it in his heart. And this remainder does not disappear except after a period of time, due to his saying: It is as if he is saying that we did not ask him except because we have a remainder of the remnants of the pre-Islamic age of ignorance. We have a remainder of the remnants of the pre-Islamic age of ignorance. For this reason, it was wise that when the fornicator is flogged, he must be exiled and driven away from the place of the crime so that he does not return to it. So a person should stay away from the places of disbelief, shirk (associating partners with Allah), and open sinfulness so that nothing of them falls into his heart. That is all.
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. He said: "Chapter on what has come regarding slaughtering for other than Allah"...