Is it obligatory to mention the name of *in*?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The name of *in* may be mentioned, and it may not be mentioned; in fact, it is usually mentioned, but it is omitted. Perhaps your mind went to the idea that
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : if you say *in* Malik was, then this *in* is a negator, did you understand?
The questioner : A negator.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is possible that it is a negator, and it is possible that it is a light *in*. If the negator is a light *in*, then its name is the pronoun of the matter, and Malik is the subject. Yes, we said *in* Zayd is standing; Zayd is the subject and standing is its predicate, and the sentence is the predicate of *in*. Did you understand?
The questioner : The name of *in*, or else the predicate of *in*.
The Shaykh : If we make it operative, we say *in*, *in* Zayd is standing. If we omit it, we say *in*
The questioner : Zayd is standing.
The Shaykh : *In* Zayd is standing.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : if you say *in* Malik was, then this *in* is a negator, did you understand?
The questioner : A negator.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is possible that it is a negator, and it is possible that it is a light *in*. If the negator is a light *in*, then its name is the pronoun of the matter, and Malik is the subject. Yes, we said *in* Zayd is standing; Zayd is the subject and standing is its predicate, and the sentence is the predicate of *in*. Did you understand?
The questioner : The name of *in*, or else the predicate of *in*.
The Shaykh : If we make it operative, we say *in*, *in* Zayd is standing. If we omit it, we say *in*
The questioner : Zayd is standing.
The Shaykh : *In* Zayd is standing.