Ibn Malik's statement "with the same name that occurred": Is the name that occurred "Zayd" in our saying "Zayd, I hit him," or is it the pronoun occupied with which refers back to...
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: Our Shaykh, his statement "with the same name that occurred"?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Is the name that occurred "Zayd" which precedes in "Zayd, I hit him"? Or "Zayd, I honored him"?
The Shaykh : This could mean that the intended meaning is the pronoun of the preceding name, or the preceding name itself.
The student: But it is not connected to a separate pronoun; that one is preceding and the verb is following.
The Shaykh : Yes, but if the pronoun were to refer back to the preceding name.
The student: It became connected.
The Shaykh : It became connected.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Is the name that occurred "Zayd" which precedes in "Zayd, I hit him"? Or "Zayd, I honored him"?
The Shaykh : This could mean that the intended meaning is the pronoun of the preceding name, or the preceding name itself.
The student: But it is not connected to a separate pronoun; that one is preceding and the verb is following.
The Shaykh : Yes, but if the pronoun were to refer back to the preceding name.
The student: It became connected.
The Shaykh : It became connected.