Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And the verb, if it is not a nāṣikh, then *** you will not generally find it with the light inna connected."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And the verb, if it is not a nāṣikh, then *** you will not generally find it with the light inna connected"
The verb: it is the subject (mubtada'), what is it?
The verb: it is the subject, and its predicate is the conditional sentence "if it is not a nāṣikh, then *** you will not generally find it with the light inna connected"
And inna: it is conditional, and lam is a particle of jussive, and yakūna is a present tense verb in the jussive case because of lam, as it is directly connected to it, and the sentence is in the position of the jussive of the conditional verb.
And nāṣikhan: it is the predicate of yakūna.
Fa la talfihi: meaning, so you will not generally find it. It is known that la is a negation particle, and talfi is a present tense verb, and the doer is hidden, estimated to be "you," and the hā' is the first object.
And ghāliban is the second object.
And his saying: "with the light inna", the one referred to is the light inna, so the bā' is a preposition, and inna is in the genitive case due to the bā' based on the form, and dhī is a description of inna, and the preposition and the genitive are connected to muṣilan.
Yes, we said that ghāliban is the second object, and we made a mistake. The correct view is that the second object is his saying muṣilan, meaning, so you will not generally find it connected. On this basis, ghāliban is in the accusative case by the deletion of the preposition, meaning, in the general case.
The meaning of the verse: that the light inna, when it enters a nominal sentence, it has been mentioned previously that it operates, and what? And it is neglected, and neglect is more common, and that if it is neglected and the meaning is not clear, it is obligatory to connect its predicate with the lām.
Does the verbal sentence connect with the light inna? He said: The verb, if it is not a nāṣikh, then you will not generally find it connected with inna, meaning that the verb does not follow it unless it is a nāṣikh, such as kāda, kāna, wajada, and the like. Allah, Blessed and Exalted is He, said:[Al-Isra 17:76] [Al-Isra 17:76] Where is the nāṣikh?
The student: Kāda.
The Shaykh : Kāda. And He, the Exalted, said:[Ali 'Imran 3:164] Kāna is a nāṣikh verb, or not? Good. And He, the Exalted, said: [Al-A'raf 7:102] And wajadna, wajada is a nāṣikh verb. And let inna, the non-nāṣikh, not follow inna, but in the general case. And this indicates that it may follow it. From this is the saying of the poet: "May your right hand be crippled if you killed a Muslim" "May your right hand be crippled if you killed a Muslim" The meaning is: May your right hand be crippled if you killed a Muslim. This is the meaning of the verse: May your right hand be crippled if you killed a Muslim. The meaning is if you killed a Muslim. And this is rare, and the more common is that nothing follows it except the verb, what? Except the nāṣikh verb.
And the lightness of its entry into the non-nāṣikh verb in this verse is the presence of the lām "if you killed a Muslim", because if he had said "if you killed a Muslim," it would have implied that it is a negation or conditional. But if he said: "if you killed a Muslim," here it is established that inna here is, what? Light, from the heavy. Good.
"And the verb, if it is not a nāṣikh, then *** you will not generally find it with the light inna connected"
Good, for example, after this brief explanation: Inna yuzayyinku li-nafsi-k, and inna yashīnuka la-hi.
Inna yuzayyinku li-nafsi-k: Is inna here light?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : The evidence
The student: The entry of the lām.
The Shaykh : The entry of the lām, and the verb here is not a nāṣikh. The verb here is not a nāṣikh. Good. And inna yashīnuka la-hi is like it, like it. This inna is the light one from the heavy, and it is not a negation due to the presence of the lām. Then the author, may Allah have mercy on him, said:
The verb: it is the subject (mubtada'), what is it?
The verb: it is the subject, and its predicate is the conditional sentence "if it is not a nāṣikh, then *** you will not generally find it with the light inna connected"
And inna: it is conditional, and lam is a particle of jussive, and yakūna is a present tense verb in the jussive case because of lam, as it is directly connected to it, and the sentence is in the position of the jussive of the conditional verb.
And nāṣikhan: it is the predicate of yakūna.
Fa la talfihi: meaning, so you will not generally find it. It is known that la is a negation particle, and talfi is a present tense verb, and the doer is hidden, estimated to be "you," and the hā' is the first object.
And ghāliban is the second object.
And his saying: "with the light inna", the one referred to is the light inna, so the bā' is a preposition, and inna is in the genitive case due to the bā' based on the form, and dhī is a description of inna, and the preposition and the genitive are connected to muṣilan.
Yes, we said that ghāliban is the second object, and we made a mistake. The correct view is that the second object is his saying muṣilan, meaning, so you will not generally find it connected. On this basis, ghāliban is in the accusative case by the deletion of the preposition, meaning, in the general case.
The meaning of the verse: that the light inna, when it enters a nominal sentence, it has been mentioned previously that it operates, and what? And it is neglected, and neglect is more common, and that if it is neglected and the meaning is not clear, it is obligatory to connect its predicate with the lām.
Does the verbal sentence connect with the light inna? He said: The verb, if it is not a nāṣikh, then you will not generally find it connected with inna, meaning that the verb does not follow it unless it is a nāṣikh, such as kāda, kāna, wajada, and the like. Allah, Blessed and Exalted is He, said:
And indeed, they were about to drive you from the land
وإن كادوا ليستفزونك من الأرضAnd indeed, they were about to drive you from the land
وإن كادوا ليستفزونك من الأرضThe student: Kāda.
The Shaykh : Kāda. And He, the Exalted, said:
although they had been before in manifest error.
وإن كانوا من قبل لفي ضلال مبينbut indeed, We found most of them defiantly disobedient.
وإن وجدنا أكثرهم لفاسقينAnd the lightness of its entry into the non-nāṣikh verb in this verse is the presence of the lām "if you killed a Muslim", because if he had said "if you killed a Muslim," it would have implied that it is a negation or conditional. But if he said: "if you killed a Muslim," here it is established that inna here is, what? Light, from the heavy. Good.
"And the verb, if it is not a nāṣikh, then *** you will not generally find it with the light inna connected"
Good, for example, after this brief explanation: Inna yuzayyinku li-nafsi-k, and inna yashīnuka la-hi.
Inna yuzayyinku li-nafsi-k: Is inna here light?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : The evidence
The student: The entry of the lām.
The Shaykh : The entry of the lām, and the verb here is not a nāṣikh. The verb here is not a nāṣikh. Good. And inna yashīnuka la-hi is like it, like it. This inna is the light one from the heavy, and it is not a negation due to the presence of the lām. Then the author, may Allah have mercy on him, said: