What is the grammatical analysis of the second word in the phrase "I stood up, I and Zayd"?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: How is its grammatical analysis?
The Shaykh : Its analysis is that it is in the nominative case.
The student: Is it in the nominative case as a substitute or for emphasis?
The Shaykh : Which one, ah, the analysis of the second word!
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, like: "I stood up, I and Zayd," yes, "I stood up" is a verb and a subject, and "I" is an emphasis for the pronoun, an emphasis for the pronoun in the phrase "I stood up," which is built on sukun (quiescence) in the position of the nominative case.
The student: Is it verbal or semantic?
The Shaykh : No, this is verbal emphasis, because the wording is all pronouns, and in the phrase "and Zayd," the waw is a conjunction, and Zayd is conjoined.
Now, if I say: "Zayd stood up, he and 'Amr," how do you analyze "he"?
The student: Is "he" also an emphasis?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is an emphasis and not the subject. "Zayd stood up, he and 'Amr," you say: Zayd is the subject, and "stood up" is a past tense verb, and its subject is hidden by permission, estimated to be "he," and "he" is an emphasis for the hidden pronoun, and 'Amr is conjoined to the hidden pronoun in "stood up."
"Conjoined, so separate with the independent pronoun": What is meant by the independent pronoun? The nominative pronoun, i.e., with the pronoun, so the alif-lam here is for reference, i.e., with the pronoun which is for the nominative case.
The Shaykh : Its analysis is that it is in the nominative case.
The student: Is it in the nominative case as a substitute or for emphasis?
The Shaykh : Which one, ah, the analysis of the second word!
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, like: "I stood up, I and Zayd," yes, "I stood up" is a verb and a subject, and "I" is an emphasis for the pronoun, an emphasis for the pronoun in the phrase "I stood up," which is built on sukun (quiescence) in the position of the nominative case.
The student: Is it verbal or semantic?
The Shaykh : No, this is verbal emphasis, because the wording is all pronouns, and in the phrase "and Zayd," the waw is a conjunction, and Zayd is conjoined.
Now, if I say: "Zayd stood up, he and 'Amr," how do you analyze "he"?
The student: Is "he" also an emphasis?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is an emphasis and not the subject. "Zayd stood up, he and 'Amr," you say: Zayd is the subject, and "stood up" is a past tense verb, and its subject is hidden by permission, estimated to be "he," and "he" is an emphasis for the hidden pronoun, and 'Amr is conjoined to the hidden pronoun in "stood up."
"Conjoined, so separate with the independent pronoun": What is meant by the independent pronoun? The nominative pronoun, i.e., with the pronoun, so the alif-lam here is for reference, i.e., with the pronoun which is for the nominative case.