What is the reason for the obligation of omission if we neglect the second operator?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: So, is their reason for not omitting before the mention?
The Shaykh : Their reason for deleting the pronoun in the first instance, if it is not the main point, is that you would omit it and make the pronoun refer back to something that comes later in both wording and rank, without any cause.
The student: And if the request differs?
The Shaykh : That is, if the request differs.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, it does not harm. I mean: one person might request it even though it is an object, and another might request it with an object, and the second as a subject?
The student: And its pronoun is the same as the first?
The Shaykh : Yes, that is correct.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : What did you say?
The student: What is brought forward?
The Shaykh : Each one.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : It is not necessary; as long as it remains in the accusative case, we do not need it.
The Shaykh : Their reason for deleting the pronoun in the first instance, if it is not the main point, is that you would omit it and make the pronoun refer back to something that comes later in both wording and rank, without any cause.
The student: And if the request differs?
The Shaykh : That is, if the request differs.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, it does not harm. I mean: one person might request it even though it is an object, and another might request it with an object, and the second as a subject?
The student: And its pronoun is the same as the first?
The Shaykh : Yes, that is correct.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : What did you say?
The student: What is brought forward?
The Shaykh : Each one.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : It is not necessary; as long as it remains in the accusative case, we do not need it.