about whether the ḥāl can be a definite noun?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : He says here: The original rule for the ḥāl is that it should be an indefinite noun.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: What do we say? I mean, generally, it is an indefinite noun.
The Shaykh : No... because the derived noun is the general rule.
The student: According to the rule.
The Shaykh : Is it permissible?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : No, he said...
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : How?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... because it means it is permissible... and I make it a definite ḥāl.
The student: As long as it is reported from the Arabs.
The Shaykh : No, what is reported is interpreted.
The reader: "And the one with a ḥāl is not usually made indefinite *** unless it is delayed or specified".
The Shaykh : No, no, and a verbal noun.
The Reciter: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: What do we say? I mean, generally, it is an indefinite noun.
The Shaykh : No... because the derived noun is the general rule.
The student: According to the rule.
The Shaykh : Is it permissible?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : No, he said...
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : How?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : ... because it means it is permissible... and I make it a definite ḥāl.
The student: As long as it is reported from the Arabs.
The Shaykh : No, what is reported is interpreted.
The reader: "And the one with a ḥāl is not usually made indefinite *** unless it is delayed or specified".
The Shaykh : No, no, and a verbal noun.
The Reciter: Yes.