regarding the fact that the *haal* (circumstantial phrase) cannot be a predicate? With the completion of the explanation of the verse.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: If the *haal* is not suitable to be a predicate, is the predicate omitted, as in this example where it is a *haal*?
The Shaykh : No, just listening to this, this is attached to listening, okay.
Then the author said, the important thing now is that we have this rule: The possessor of the *haal* cannot be anything but an indefinite noun, except in three places?
The student: Except a definite noun.
The Shaykh : Huh? Except a definite noun, yes. The possessor of the *haal* cannot be a definite noun in three places: which are: if it is delayed, if it occurs after a negation or something similar to it, if it is specified by addition or description, then the *haal* comes from it while it is an indefinite noun.
The Shaykh : No, just listening to this, this is attached to listening, okay.
Then the author said, the important thing now is that we have this rule: The possessor of the *haal* cannot be anything but an indefinite noun, except in three places?
The student: Except a definite noun.
The Shaykh : Huh? Except a definite noun, yes. The possessor of the *haal* cannot be a definite noun in three places: which are: if it is delayed, if it occurs after a negation or something similar to it, if it is specified by addition or description, then the *haal* comes from it while it is an indefinite noun.