Explanation of the Book of Marriage-14
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Then he said: "And from Abu Salama ibn 'Abd al-Rahman": Do you have (may Allah be pleased with him) in all the copies?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : It is well known that he is from the Tabi'un.
"He said: I asked 'A'ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), 'What was the bridal gift of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him)?' She said:Sunan ad-Darimi 11:33, then she said: 'Do you know what a nash is?' I said: 'No.' She said: 'Half an uqiyah, so that makes five hundred dirhams. This is the bridal gift of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) for his wives.' Muslim narrated it."
Abu Salama ibn 'Abd al-Rahman is from the Tabi'un, and 'A'ishah is well known to be from the Companions, and if he lived during her time, he is considered among the earliest of the Tabi'un.
He asked her what the bridal gift of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) was, without specifying.
And "wives" is the plural of "wife," and it is a plural of the opposite type, which implies generality, but here it is a general term intended for a specific meaning, because this amount mentioned by 'A'ishah was not for all the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), as will come, but as will come and as has passed, the mahr of Safiyyah was her manumission, so it is a general term intended for the specific.
Sunan Ibn Majah 1886Sahih (Darussalam): Twelve is said as "athnata 'ashara" and also as "thnata 'ashara," just as one says "thnatan" and "athnatan" and "ibnatan" and "bintan," and the meaning is the same, but I am asking now: 'Abd al-Rahman ibn Dawud, why did he say "athnata 'ashara" and not "athnata 'ashara"?
The student: The predicate of "was."
The Shaykh : The khabar of "kana," and how do you parse it?
The student: "Sadaqan" is its name, and "athnata 'ashara uqiyah" is its khabar.
The Shaykh : Is the whole world all three of these?
The student: No... ten, yes, it is built.
The Shaykh : And what is built?
The student: A specification (tamyiz).
The Shaykh : Is it a built tamyiz?
The student: It is called "mansub al-juz'ayn" (declined in both parts).
The Shaykh : Mansub al-juz'ayn?
The student: Yes, athnata 'ashara, five, ten.
The Shaykh : It is not mansub al-juz'ayn.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is a compound of two parts in the position of accusative, a compound.
The Shaykh : Yes, but the fathah here, athnata 'ashara?
The student: It is all a compound, a compound.
The Shaykh : Yes, but the problem is if it becomes nominative, how do we say it?
The student: Athnata 'ashara.
The Shaykh : Athnata 'ashara, and it is well known that what is built does not change with different grammatical factors.
The student: There is no factor that parses the second part.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: On the second part.
The Shaykh : Meaning it is parsed on the second part? Then it must be parsed, and for this reason, yes?
The student: The first is parsed and the second is built.
The Shaykh : Yes, they say that the first is parsed, this is an exception, and the second has no grammatical position because it is in the position of tanwin, meaning like a covering, and this indicates that language is need, not the rules of grammar, because for such an example, they cannot give a convincing answer, because it is said: the one built on the two parts, they were asked: how can it be built when it changes with different grammatical factors, and it is well known that what changes with different grammatical factors is not called built.
And if they say it is parsed, we say: well, parsed is closer than being built, but what do you say about "ten"?
They said: this has no grammatical position because it is not correct for it to be a mudaf and a mudaf ilayh, but it is in the position of tanwin, they are told: well, why did you not say this for "thirteen" and say: it is a compound, so it is built on the fathah of the two parts, in any case, what we see is to say as I think al-Kisa'i said.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : It is well known that he is from the Tabi'un.
"He said: I asked 'A'ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), 'What was the bridal gift of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him)?' She said:
His bridal gift for his wives was twelve uqiyah and a nash
كان صداقه لأزواجه اثنتي عشرة أوقية ونشاAbu Salama ibn 'Abd al-Rahman is from the Tabi'un, and 'A'ishah is well known to be from the Companions, and if he lived during her time, he is considered among the earliest of the Tabi'un.
He asked her what the bridal gift of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) was, without specifying.
So she said: His bridal gift for his wives
فقالت : كان صداقه لأزواجهThe dowry he gave to his wives was twelve Uqiyyah and a Nash
قالت : كانت اثنتي عشرة أوقية ونشاThe student: The predicate of "was."
The Shaykh : The khabar of "kana," and how do you parse it?
The student: "Sadaqan" is its name, and "athnata 'ashara uqiyah" is its khabar.
The Shaykh : Is the whole world all three of these?
The student: No... ten, yes, it is built.
The Shaykh : And what is built?
The student: A specification (tamyiz).
The Shaykh : Is it a built tamyiz?
The student: It is called "mansub al-juz'ayn" (declined in both parts).
The Shaykh : Mansub al-juz'ayn?
The student: Yes, athnata 'ashara, five, ten.
The Shaykh : It is not mansub al-juz'ayn.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It is a compound of two parts in the position of accusative, a compound.
The Shaykh : Yes, but the fathah here, athnata 'ashara?
The student: It is all a compound, a compound.
The Shaykh : Yes, but the problem is if it becomes nominative, how do we say it?
The student: Athnata 'ashara.
The Shaykh : Athnata 'ashara, and it is well known that what is built does not change with different grammatical factors.
The student: There is no factor that parses the second part.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: On the second part.
The Shaykh : Meaning it is parsed on the second part? Then it must be parsed, and for this reason, yes?
The student: The first is parsed and the second is built.
The Shaykh : Yes, they say that the first is parsed, this is an exception, and the second has no grammatical position because it is in the position of tanwin, meaning like a covering, and this indicates that language is need, not the rules of grammar, because for such an example, they cannot give a convincing answer, because it is said: the one built on the two parts, they were asked: how can it be built when it changes with different grammatical factors, and it is well known that what changes with different grammatical factors is not called built.
And if they say it is parsed, we say: well, parsed is closer than being built, but what do you say about "ten"?
They said: this has no grammatical position because it is not correct for it to be a mudaf and a mudaf ilayh, but it is in the position of tanwin, they are told: well, why did you not say this for "thirteen" and say: it is a compound, so it is built on the fathah of the two parts, in any case, what we see is to say as I think al-Kisa'i said.