The ruling on one who travels by air and passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram for 'Umrah
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
From the Sudair region, Jilajil, the listener Sulayman ibn Ibrahim al-Wakil sent a question saying: A man arrived from Egypt with the intention of performing 'Umrah and working, traveling by air. When passing by the miqat, his ihram clothes were in his luggage, so he landed at the airport and entered the state of ihram from Jeddah. Does he owe anything? And what is the ruling on his 'Umrah? We ask for information and guidance.
Answer: Yes, he owes a sacrificial animal because he left the miqat without entering the state of ihram, and his 'Umrah is valid. He owes a sacrificial animal for not entering the state of ihram from the miqat. If he had entered the state of ihram in his regular clothes from the beginning of his ihram, entering in his clothes with their seams and uncovering his head, and intending to enter the state of ihram while at the miqat, that would have been what was obligatory for him. Then he would put on the ihram clothes afterwards. He would owe, for the continuation of the sewn clothes, fasting for three days, or feeding six poor people, or slaughtering a sheep. These three options: either fasting for three days, or feeding six poor people, or slaughtering a sheep, because he continued wearing the sewn clothes at the miqat and after it, until he put on the ihram clothes. This is what is obligatory for the one who reaches the miqat and does not find the ihram clothes: he enters the state of ihram in his regular clothes, intends the ihram in his clothes, and recites the talbiyah, and he is excused in this situation. And when he finds the clothes afterwards, he removes the sewn clothes and puts on the ihram clothes, but he must uncover his head, because uncovering the head is easy. Yes.
The presenter: May Allah reward you with good.
Answer: Yes, he owes a sacrificial animal because he left the miqat without entering the state of ihram, and his 'Umrah is valid. He owes a sacrificial animal for not entering the state of ihram from the miqat. If he had entered the state of ihram in his regular clothes from the beginning of his ihram, entering in his clothes with their seams and uncovering his head, and intending to enter the state of ihram while at the miqat, that would have been what was obligatory for him. Then he would put on the ihram clothes afterwards. He would owe, for the continuation of the sewn clothes, fasting for three days, or feeding six poor people, or slaughtering a sheep. These three options: either fasting for three days, or feeding six poor people, or slaughtering a sheep, because he continued wearing the sewn clothes at the miqat and after it, until he put on the ihram clothes. This is what is obligatory for the one who reaches the miqat and does not find the ihram clothes: he enters the state of ihram in his regular clothes, intends the ihram in his clothes, and recites the talbiyah, and he is excused in this situation. And when he finds the clothes afterwards, he removes the sewn clothes and puts on the ihram clothes, but he must uncover his head, because uncovering the head is easy. Yes.
The presenter: May Allah reward you with good.
Source
binbaz.org.sa
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
