Continuation of the discussion regarding the washing of the garment affected by semen.

The questioner: Yes, Shaykh.

The Shaykh: That is. So I told him, I said, doubt is removed by certainty.

The questioner : Yes.

The Shaykh: And then, what happened? There was a conversation between me and him. What did he say? It seems the conversation was cut off. In any case, what is your question? What is your problem?

The questioner: That here, doubt is removed by certainty, meaning is this thing ritually impure or not... the question itself.

The Shaykh: What is the thing? His question was general; it was not specific. He had doubt about the ritual impurity of the inner garments, but no doubt about the outer ones. He had doubt, so I told him, I said, doubt is removed by certainty. But we did not enter into, for example, if he had said to me: "My inner garment was affected by semen," I would tell him this is not ritually impure, let alone the outer garment. But he did not specify the type of thing that caused the doubt for him.

The questioner: The question is about wet dreams. Is this understood from it?

The Shaykh: No, I understood intercourse from it. I did not notice the word "wet dream."

The questioner: Then... it removes the doubt here. It is a wet dream.

The Shaykh: If it is a wet dream, then you have understood the answer now.

The questioner : Yes, yes.

The Shaykh: All right.

The questioner : May Allah reward you with good.

The Shaykh : And beware of that.