Questions about some of the rulings on the diminutive form of names?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : No, no, we look at his father's name, his father's name and his profession. If he is known by this profession, for example, suppose he is a car mechanic named Mahmoud, I would say, "I went in my car to Humayd to have it fixed?" It is understood from the context, yes?
The student: The Shaykh, the common people say: Humayd.
The Shaykh : Hamid among the common people, yes, they say Humayd, huh? And what do they say for Mahmoud?
The student: Muhaymid.
The Shaykh : Muhaymid.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, no, for Muhammad they say Muhaymid.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, they say Humaydi, I think, yes.
The student : Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The context is supposed to specify it for someone who does not know him.
The Shaykh : Hehe.
The student: It is known from the context ...
The Shaykh : Do you pluralize it as?
The student: Hawa'id.
The Shaykh : As Hawa'id, yes, because Hawa'id is a description for a female.
The reader: "And complete the deficient in the diminutive".
The Shaykh : What about a pregnant woman?
The student: Hawamil.
The Shaykh : Hawamil?
The student: Yes, indeed.
Another student: It needs to be looked into.
The Shaykh : It needs to be looked into. If she is pregnant, meaning: carrying something on her head, it must be feminized, so you say: Hamilah, yes, and you say for them: Hawamil, like Daribah and Duwarib. But if you say Hamil, meaning carrying a child in her womb, there is no need for the taa, and the reason? Because Hamil from the verb of carrying in the womb is specific to the female, so there is no need for the distinguishing taa, yes.
The student: The Shaykh, the common people say: Humayd.
The Shaykh : Hamid among the common people, yes, they say Humayd, huh? And what do they say for Mahmoud?
The student: Muhaymid.
The Shaykh : Muhaymid.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, no, for Muhammad they say Muhaymid.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, they say Humaydi, I think, yes.
The student : Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The context is supposed to specify it for someone who does not know him.
The Shaykh : Hehe.
The student: It is known from the context ...
The Shaykh : Do you pluralize it as?
The student: Hawa'id.
The Shaykh : As Hawa'id, yes, because Hawa'id is a description for a female.
The reader: "And complete the deficient in the diminutive".
The Shaykh : What about a pregnant woman?
The student: Hawamil.
The Shaykh : Hawamil?
The student: Yes, indeed.
Another student: It needs to be looked into.
The Shaykh : It needs to be looked into. If she is pregnant, meaning: carrying something on her head, it must be feminized, so you say: Hamilah, yes, and you say for them: Hawamil, like Daribah and Duwarib. But if you say Hamil, meaning carrying a child in her womb, there is no need for the taa, and the reason? Because Hamil from the verb of carrying in the womb is specific to the female, so there is no need for the distinguishing taa, yes.