Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: " And perhaps the form of connection is given what *** belongs to stopping, in prose and in verse, in a coherent manner
The form of connection may be given the ruling of stopping, and this is common in verse and rare in prose. An example in prose is the saying of Allah the Exalted:[Al-Baqarah 2:259] And an example in verse is his saying: "Like the fire, it agreed with the reeds".
The Shaykh : The reeds.
The reader: " The reeds, so the ba' was weakened, and it is connected to the letter of generalization, which is the alif ".
The Shaykh : He means that the form of connection may be given the ruling of stopping, as detailed previously, for example:[Al-Baqarah 2:259] What is its origin?
The student: It has not been defiled.
The Shaykh : It has not been defiled, and the haa of pause came with the connection, and it is not said "it has not been defiled him" ... He means that it may come to mind that the haa is part of the verb and that it was made jussive by lam, like "it has not changed," like "it has not changed" completely.
The student: Is the ra' static?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: And is the ra' static in "it has not changed"?
The Shaykh : Yes, but they are the same in meaning. "It has not changed" and "it has not been defiled him" have the same meaning. He means that someone might say that it is part of the verb, like "it has not changed." Based on its meter, we say no. "It has not been defiled" is the root of the verb, and the haa is for pause. As for " Like the fire, it agreed with the reeds ", this is strange. What is the meaning of "the reeds" here?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Its origin is "reeds," but this is one of the five aspects that were mentioned to us. Which one is it?
The student: Weakening.
The Shaykh : Weakening. And the alif here is for generalization; it has no part in the word. He means this is not the alif of tanwin. If it were the alif of tanwin, transposition would not be permissible ... But this alif is for generalization, outside of inflection, and it is not possible to put tanwin on the alif. Yes, so he said: " The reeds ". Who said it? Look in the commentary, who said it?
The student: Ru'bah.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The form of connection may be given the ruling of stopping, and this is common in verse and rare in prose. An example in prose is the saying of Allah the Exalted:
it has not changed with time. And look
لم يتسنه وانظرThe Shaykh : The reeds.
The reader: " The reeds, so the ba' was weakened, and it is connected to the letter of generalization, which is the alif ".
The Shaykh : He means that the form of connection may be given the ruling of stopping, as detailed previously, for example:
Look at your food and your drink; it has not changed with time
وانظر إلى طعامك وشرابك لم يتسنّهThe student: It has not been defiled.
The Shaykh : It has not been defiled, and the haa of pause came with the connection, and it is not said "it has not been defiled him" ... He means that it may come to mind that the haa is part of the verb and that it was made jussive by lam,
It has not been defiled him
لم يتسنّهIt has not been defiled him
لم يتسنّهThe student: Is the ra' static?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: And is the ra' static in "it has not changed"?
The Shaykh : Yes, but they are the same in meaning. "It has not changed" and "it has not been defiled him" have the same meaning. He means that someone might say that
It has not been defiled him
لم يتسنّهThe student: ...
The Shaykh : Its origin is "reeds," but this is one of the five aspects that were mentioned to us. Which one is it?
The student: Weakening.
The Shaykh : Weakening. And the alif here is for generalization; it has no part in the word. He means this is not the alif of tanwin. If it were the alif of tanwin, transposition would not be permissible ... But this alif is for generalization, outside of inflection, and it is not possible to put tanwin on the alif. Yes, so he said: " The reeds ". Who said it? Look in the commentary, who said it?
The student: Ru'bah.
The Shaykh : Yes.