Does vomiting invalidate the ablution?

Question:
What is the evidence that what exits from other than the two passages invalidates the ablution?

Answer:
The hadith: "He vomited and then performed ablution," and the analogy is based on the severity and impurity of the matter. The basis for this is: "He vomited and then performed ablution." I do not know—meaning—anything clear on the subject other than that he vomited and then performed ablution, and the analogy is with what exits from the two passages; because it resembles what exits from the two passages, such as urine, pre-seminal fluid, or the like.
Some scholars do not hold that what exits from other than the two passages invalidates the ablution.
This is a matter of precaution. What exits from other than the two passages is a matter of precaution and moving away from scholarly disagreement.
Q: Is the hadith of al-Tirmidhi established?
A: "He vomited and then performed ablution," and in some narrations: "He vomited and then broke his fast." There is a discussion regarding its chain of narration, and there is also a difference in its text.