Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

The Shaykh’s explanation of the usul principle: “When two texts are in conflict, one being general and the other specific, the specific is excluded from the general.”

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : And from this, a jurisprudential usul principle remains, which is: “When two texts are in conflict, one being general and the other specific, the specific is excluded from the general.”
In other words: if there is a general text, meaning it has a broad meaning, and there is another text with a narrow meaning, but this narrow meaning contradicts that general text in part of its parts, then in this case the lesser meaning is excluded from the greater meaning.
If we look at the hadith:
Silk is only worn by one who has no share. يلبس الحرير من لا خلاق له في الآخرة
Sunan an-Nasa'i 5307Sahih (Darussalam)
Here, silk is mentioned in a general sense, so it includes both a little and a lot, with no difference between them, because it was generalized and not specified.
But in the hadith regarding the wearing of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), there is a specific mention that the jacket was not made of silk; rather, the garment was a tawil, except that there was a piece of silk at the ends of the sleeves of this jacket, the size of a shibr (a standard measure of a shibr). This piece is silk, so this small amount of silk is excluded from the large amount of forbidden silk.
It is said, in the expression of the scholars: His statement (peace and blessings be upon him):
Silk is only worn by one who has no share. يلبس الحرير من لا خلاق له في الآخرة
Sunan an-Nasa'i 5307Sahih (Darussalam)
is a general statement that includes all silk, whether much or little. But the small amount is excluded from this hadith that forbids wearing a small amount of silk; it is excluded from the prohibition of this text by the small amount in the hadith of the Prophet’s (peace and blessings be upon him) jacket, which had a small amount of silk on it.
It is said: Silk as a garment, a shirt, or a jacket is forbidden by the evidence of this general hadith. But it is not so if a man wears a garment of permissible fabric that has a piece of silk in it for the benefit of the garment, for example, here... the silk has resistance, so if this piece of silk is for preserving the garment from rapid decay and wear, then there is no harm in using this piece of silk in a worn-out garment.
As for the garment being entirely silk, that is forbidden by the text of this hadith and by other explicit hadiths forbidding silk for men, such as the well-known hadith:
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) came out one day to his Companions with silk in one hand and gold in the other, and he (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “These are forbidden for the men of my Ummah, but permitted for their women.” أن الرسول عليه السلام خرج ذات يوم على أصحابه وفي إحدى يديه حرير وفي الأخرى ذهب فقال عليه الصلاة والسلام: هذان حرام على رجال أمتى حل لإناثها

So if we keep in mind this last hadith:
permissible for its females حل لإناثها
and look at the text of the second hadith:
This is worn by the one who will have no share in the Hereafter. إنما يلبسها من لا خلاق له في الآخرة
Sahih al-Bukhari 2612
meaning, the one who wears a silk jacket is one who has no share in the Hereafter.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas