Explanation of the hadith of Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her): (I know when you are angry and when you are pleased. She said: I asked, How do you know that, O Messenger of Allah? He said: When you are pleased, you say, Yes, by the Lord of Muhammad)

The Shaykh : The author now mentions a hadith that, at first glance, appears to have no connection to boycotting a Muslim, as that is the title of the book. However, after we read it to you, the connection between it and this chapter will become apparent. The author narrated from Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) that she said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: .
From Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her), she said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: . She said: I said: How do you know that, O Messenger of Allah? He said: . She said: I said: Yes, I do not boycott you except for your name.
This hadith points to human nature and the fact that even a perfect person may sometimes say something that should not be said, due to a fit of anger, a psychological state, or similar matters that affect a person, whether male or female. What such a person says in such a state does not fall under the category of boycotting that is prohibited in the previous hadith and the preceding hadiths. Why? Because this state does not last with its owner; as we said, it is not like the three days we mentioned, which are permitted to test one's character. Rather, it is only for a moment or a short while, and then the soul returns to its nature. This story, narrated by Lady Aisha, the protagonist of the story herself, indicates to us that while this is not perfection, it is also not a matter of permission. She says that the Messenger (peace be upon him) said to her one day: ; meaning, whether you are pleased with me or angry with me. She said: I said: How do you know that, O Messenger of Allah? He said: إنَّك إذا كنت راضيةً قلت : بلى وربِّ محمد When you are pleased, you say, "Yes, by the Lord of Muhammad,'Sahih al-Bukhari 6078; she swore by Allah (Mighty and Majestic), her Lord, and she specifically attributed the Lordship to her beloved, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), saying, "By the Lord of Muhammad." وإذا كنت ساخطةً قلت : لا وربِّ إبراهيم but when you are angry, you say, 'No, by the Lord of Abraham!'Sahih al-Bukhari 6078. The oath is the same; the Lord of Muhammad is the Lord of Ibrahim and the Lord of all, but this is, in reality, from the gentleness of Lady Aisha and her wisdom and intelligence in expressing what is in her heart toward her husband. She does not boycott him; even now, she remembered that she said to him in some hadiths: "By Allah, O Messenger of Allah, I do not boycott you except for your name." So, when she was pleased, she said, "By the Lord of Muhammad," and when she was angry, she said, "By the Lord of Ibrahim." So she said here in the answer: "The matter is as you say, O Messenger of Allah, and I do not boycott you except for your name." As for boycotting your person, that is far from me, for that is a great sin, especially since you are the master of mankind (peace and blessings be upon him). Thus, this hadith, while making us feel that human nature may sometimes change, requires that a person not allow himself to be carried away by this change and leave the matter to mere formalities, as in the example between them: in pleasure, she says, "By the Lord of Muhammad," and in anger, she says, "By the Lord of Ibrahim." Excuse me, this addition is in the same hadith, because she said, "I said, Yes, that is so." This is her voice, the Messenger... "Yes, I do not boycott you except for your name" is the narration in the same book.