What is your opinion on the issues that are widespread in their affliction, where a text exists but it contradicts what is well-known among the scholars, and an example of this is
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The rule in issues that are widespread in their affliction and where a text has come - yes - do you reject them because they are not well-known among the scholars? Yes. An example of this is: returning in a state of ihram for the one on whom the sun sets on the Day of Sacrifice - yes - he returns in his state as he was in ihram - yes - and has not performed the Tawaf of Farewell.
The student: The Tawaf of Ifadah.
The questioner : The Tawaf of Ifadah. So this hadith may be rejected by some scholars or they may leave acting upon it because it is one of the issues that are widespread in their affliction and it is not well-known among the scholars and they did not accept it. So what is your answer to this? This is as an example...
The Shaykh : No problem, my answer to this specifically is mentioned in the treatise, and its detail is that in my view, when the one who says that this hadith or another... but as you said, this is an example.
The questioner : Yes, indeed
The Shaykh : You will find something of this
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : Which is stronger, what you presented or what I presented?
The questioner : No, this, due to its extreme clarity, does not need to be asked about. What you presented.
The Shaykh : What I presented.
The questioner : What you presented.
The Shaykh : What I presented.
The questioner : This does not need to be asked.
The Shaykh : Very good, but which one do I choose: the one in which consensus is claimed, which contradicts the hadith, or the one where it is said that we have not known anyone who acted upon it?
The questioner : In the first place, consensus cannot occur in this.
The Shaykh : But they transmitted it.
The questioner : They transmitted it, and this is very dangerous.
The Shaykh : And this is of this kind, the kind you know is like what I presented.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Of course.
The student: The Tawaf of Ifadah.
The questioner : The Tawaf of Ifadah. So this hadith may be rejected by some scholars or they may leave acting upon it because it is one of the issues that are widespread in their affliction and it is not well-known among the scholars and they did not accept it. So what is your answer to this? This is as an example...
The Shaykh : No problem, my answer to this specifically is mentioned in the treatise, and its detail is that in my view, when the one who says that this hadith or another... but as you said, this is an example.
The questioner : Yes, indeed
The Shaykh : You will find something of this
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : Which is stronger, what you presented or what I presented?
The questioner : No, this, due to its extreme clarity, does not need to be asked about. What you presented.
The Shaykh : What I presented.
The questioner : What you presented.
The Shaykh : What I presented.
The questioner : This does not need to be asked.
The Shaykh : Very good, but which one do I choose: the one in which consensus is claimed, which contradicts the hadith, or the one where it is said that we have not known anyone who acted upon it?
The questioner : In the first place, consensus cannot occur in this.
The Shaykh : But they transmitted it.
The questioner : They transmitted it, and this is very dangerous.
The Shaykh : And this is of this kind, the kind you know is like what I presented.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Of course.