Are the hadiths that forbid approaching a woman in her rear authentic?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner: Are - my teacher - the hadiths that forbid approaching a woman in her rear?
The Shaykh : Valid?
The questioner: Authentic, meaning?
The Shaykh: Of course.
The questioner : It is valid.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Meaning there is no room left for anyone to argue otherwise.
Another questioner: And it contains a curse.
The Shaykh :Bulugh al-Maram 8:56 .
Another questioner: ... Imam Malik is among the imams with this view.
The questioner: But it is actually narrated from Imam Malik that he permitted it.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Without disliking it?
The Shaykh: No, with disliking, I said.
Another questioner: And it may not be established from him.
Another questioner: Meaning ... with disliking, approaching the woman with disliking?
The Shaykh: No; the approach is not with disliking, no, the permissibility, meaning.
The questioner : The permissibility.
The Shaykh: The permissibility, yes, but I do not have it firmly established in my mind right now regarding the authenticity of the second view from Malik.
The questioner: Meaning, I think - teacher - his evidence for the permissibility of eating the dog is the permissibility of things not forbidden that are explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an, including, of course, the dog?
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Okay; the donkey, is it permissible to eat it according to them, considering the Sunnah explicitly states that it is not permissible to eat it?
The Shaykh : It is not permissible.
Another questioner: Our Shaykh, is it permissible to eat the hyena?
The Shaykh : ... .
Another questioner: In what did we say the text?
The Shaykh : ... .
Another questioner: Okay, what does he say by text: ... every one with fangs and claws, this one has fangs and claws, meaning Imam Malik has no answer to the hadith?
Yes?
The questioner: It does not have claws, it has fangs.
Another questioner: It has nails.
The questioner: Its nails are not used, they are known, we know them.
Another questioner : Yes.
The questioner: They are a scientific fact.
Another questioner: Okay; fangs.
The Shaykh : ... .
The questioner: No, dogs, even the whole family, wolves, jackals, and foxes, they all hunt with their mouths, not with their hands, unlike cats.
Another questioner : Okay; so then.
The questioner: Meaning the tiger, the lion, and the cat, they all hunt with their hands, they catch with the hand, while the canines, which are the wolf, the fox, the jackal, and others, hunt with the mouth, directly ... with the mouth ... .
...
Another questioner: Meaning can we say the hadith of "every one with fangs" did not reach him; Imam Malik, if he said this view?
The Shaykh : I gave you the answer.
Another questioner: I said: I do not know, I think.
The Shaykh: No, be certain.
Another questioner : Yes?
The questioner: You need to be more certain, meaning.
The Shaykh: Be certain that I told you.
Another questioner: I did not grasp what I told you, not until now ... if someone asked me: What did he say to you? I would tell him: I do not know.
The Shaykh: Now what did I say? I said that I do not know.
Another questioner: Is that how it is?
The Shaykh: Like that, did you not speak about me?
Another questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh: How can you say I do not know when you know? We are enough for the confusion.
The questioner: He does not know, only there is no need for "I do not know" that he does not know.
The Shaykh: ... we, that something we know, we say about it we do not know, we are enough for the thing we do not know that we do not know.
Another questioner: But we have general rules ... I do not think that Imam Malik, who is, meaning, from the Salafis, is considered, or he is the Salaf himself, it is not conceivable that he would contradict the hadith of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him).
The Shaykh : May Allah forgive you!
The questioner: No one said this.
The Shaykh : May Allah forgive you!
Another questioner: Meaning we do not want to find an excuse for the Imam? ... we see it as a contradiction.
The questioner: Of course.
Another questioner: We want to find an excuse for him.
The Shaykh: Yes, what is the excuse? You did not bring the excuse, you brought that you do not think, but you did not bring the excuse!
The questioner: The excuse is that the hadith did not reach him.
The Shaykh: How can you say this, the one who says this, how can he say ... we do not think that one would contradict the hadith of the Messenger? Say: We do not think that he knows the hadith and contradicts it.
Another questioner : That is it.
The Shaykh: That is it, that is in your intention, not in your wording, we want your wording.
Another questioner : .
The Shaykh : Valid?
The questioner: Authentic, meaning?
The Shaykh: Of course.
The questioner : It is valid.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Meaning there is no room left for anyone to argue otherwise.
Another questioner: And it contains a curse.
The Shaykh :
He who has intercourse with a woman through her anus is accursed.
ملعون من أتى امرأةً في دبرهاAnother questioner: ... Imam Malik is among the imams with this view.
The questioner: But it is actually narrated from Imam Malik that he permitted it.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Without disliking it?
The Shaykh: No, with disliking, I said.
Another questioner: And it may not be established from him.
Another questioner: Meaning ... with disliking, approaching the woman with disliking?
The Shaykh: No; the approach is not with disliking, no, the permissibility, meaning.
The questioner : The permissibility.
The Shaykh: The permissibility, yes, but I do not have it firmly established in my mind right now regarding the authenticity of the second view from Malik.
The questioner: Meaning, I think - teacher - his evidence for the permissibility of eating the dog is the permissibility of things not forbidden that are explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an, including, of course, the dog?
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Okay; the donkey, is it permissible to eat it according to them, considering the Sunnah explicitly states that it is not permissible to eat it?
The Shaykh : It is not permissible.
Another questioner: Our Shaykh, is it permissible to eat the hyena?
The Shaykh : ... .
Another questioner: In what did we say the text?
The Shaykh : ... .
Another questioner: Okay, what does he say by text: ... every one with fangs and claws, this one has fangs and claws, meaning Imam Malik has no answer to the hadith?
Yes?
The questioner: It does not have claws, it has fangs.
Another questioner: It has nails.
The questioner: Its nails are not used, they are known, we know them.
Another questioner : Yes.
The questioner: They are a scientific fact.
Another questioner: Okay; fangs.
The Shaykh : ... .
The questioner: No, dogs, even the whole family, wolves, jackals, and foxes, they all hunt with their mouths, not with their hands, unlike cats.
Another questioner : Okay; so then.
The questioner: Meaning the tiger, the lion, and the cat, they all hunt with their hands, they catch with the hand, while the canines, which are the wolf, the fox, the jackal, and others, hunt with the mouth, directly ... with the mouth ... .
...
Another questioner: Meaning can we say the hadith of "every one with fangs" did not reach him; Imam Malik, if he said this view?
The Shaykh : I gave you the answer.
Another questioner: I said: I do not know, I think.
The Shaykh: No, be certain.
Another questioner : Yes?
The questioner: You need to be more certain, meaning.
The Shaykh: Be certain that I told you.
Another questioner: I did not grasp what I told you, not until now ... if someone asked me: What did he say to you? I would tell him: I do not know.
The Shaykh: Now what did I say? I said that I do not know.
Another questioner: Is that how it is?
The Shaykh: Like that, did you not speak about me?
Another questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh: How can you say I do not know when you know? We are enough for the confusion.
The questioner: He does not know, only there is no need for "I do not know" that he does not know.
The Shaykh: ... we, that something we know, we say about it we do not know, we are enough for the thing we do not know that we do not know.
Another questioner: But we have general rules ... I do not think that Imam Malik, who is, meaning, from the Salafis, is considered, or he is the Salaf himself, it is not conceivable that he would contradict the hadith of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him).
The Shaykh : May Allah forgive you!
The questioner: No one said this.
The Shaykh : May Allah forgive you!
Another questioner: Meaning we do not want to find an excuse for the Imam? ... we see it as a contradiction.
The questioner: Of course.
Another questioner: We want to find an excuse for him.
The Shaykh: Yes, what is the excuse? You did not bring the excuse, you brought that you do not think, but you did not bring the excuse!
The questioner: The excuse is that the hadith did not reach him.
The Shaykh: How can you say this, the one who says this, how can he say ... we do not think that one would contradict the hadith of the Messenger? Say: We do not think that he knows the hadith and contradicts it.
Another questioner : That is it.
The Shaykh: That is it, that is in your intention, not in your wording, we want your wording.
Another questioner :
Actions are only by intentions
إنما الأعمال بالنيات
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.