The ruling on questioning students by the school administration without cause
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Regarding the current state of schools and the behavioral errors committed by students, does the school administration have the right to sit with students who have shown no signs of error or disobedience? Is it permissible for them to sit with them and inquire about matters that did not even originate from them?Meaning: In the name of verification or searching for corrupting elements among the students, even though nothing has appeared from this student? Is it permissible for me to ask him about his circumstances, what he has, and what is behind him?
There must be strong evidence that necessitates the accusation. In that case, there is no harm in investigating. However, this should not be done among the students, because if it is done among the students, there is a fear that this accused person, who may be innocent, will be accused by the students. As for if it is only the talk of the students among themselves, that is not accepted. The talk of students is problematic; they are peers, some of them envy others, and they speak about them without being truthful. If there is no evidence, he is not summoned. Therefore, this is not permissible.
There must be strong evidence that necessitates the accusation. In that case, there is no harm in investigating. However, this should not be done among the students, because if it is done among the students, there is a fear that this accused person, who may be innocent, will be accused by the students. As for if it is only the talk of the students among themselves, that is not accepted. The talk of students is problematic; they are peers, some of them envy others, and they speak about them without being truthful. If there is no evidence, he is not summoned. Therefore, this is not permissible.