He made the Victorious Group the group of the mujahideen and fighters, so what is your response?

The questioner: Meaning, he provides evidence that the group of jihad is the true group, and says: The evidence is that the hadith of the group; , and the hadith: . He responds with three explanations:
He says: The first is the continuity and persistence of the Victorious Group fighting for the truth until the descent of 'Isa (peace be upon him).
The second is the validity and legitimacy of the leadership over this group on the tongue of our Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him); where he said: .
The third is: .
And the appointment of the Muslims of one of them as their leader; he said: It is not specific to the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) due to the persistence of this ruling until the descent of 'Isa (peace be upon him).

The Shaykh: Does this speaker mean that the Victorious Group is confined to a country?

The questioner: No, he seems to confine it to the fighting group.

The Shaykh: You have strayed from the answer.

The questioner : How, my Shaykh?

The Shaykh: Is this how we are going to work with you? My question is: Does this person say that the Victorious Group is confined to a country?

The questioner: No, he does not say that.

The Shaykh : Oh?

The questioner: No.

The Shaykh: Okay; but he says that the Victorious Group is confined.
Yes?

Another questioner: Hello.

The Shaykh: Yes.

Another questioner: Peace be upon you.

The Shaykh: And upon you peace.

Another questioner: After our master, the Shaykh.

The Shaykh: Go ahead.

Another questioner: We have this dream, by Allah, if there is a possibility?

The Shaykh: No, by Allah; I am not among the scholars of dream interpretation.

Another questioner: Okay; fine, may Allah reward you with good.

The Shaykh : You are welcome.
Did I understand you?

The questioner: Yes.

The Shaykh: If the Victorious Group is not confined by the text of these hadiths, but rather the opposite in some of them, that the prince will be in Damascus on the day 'Isa (peace be upon him) descends at the white minaret, and he says to the Mahdi, who has advanced to lead the people in prayer as imam. What did he say to him? What are you?

The questioner: He will be the prince.

The Shaykh: , so this is a well-known hadith that it will occur in Damascus, this is in the future, but as long as there is no hadith stating that the Victorious Group is confined to a region or a country; how does he infer the specific from the general? Is this knowledge?
If the matter were as follows - for example: there is a group or this same group existing in Damascus or existing in the vicinity of Bayt al-Maqdis; he infers from some hadiths; we say: By Allah, this is sound inference; why? Because it is mentioned that this group will be in Damascus or in the vicinity of Bayt al-Maqdis.
The hadith that came regarding the vicinity of Bayt al-Maqdis is not authentic, so the inference is dropped.
And the hadith that came that the Victorious Group is in Damascus is in "Sahih al-Bukhari", but from a hadith of Mu'adh stopping at him, so it is possible to infer from it, and it is possible not to infer from it; nevertheless, if it is inferred from it, where is this Victorious Group that is called today the group of jihad? Is it in Damascus? Is it in the vicinity of Bayt al-Maqdis? The answer in reality is that he says: No. So how do they drag these evidences and apply them to themselves?!