Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

If a person dies and has fasting remaining, is it obligatory for his guardian to feed one poor person for each day?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : If a person dies and has fasting remaining, is it obligatory for his guardian to feed a poor person on his behalf for each day?
If this is correct, what is the evidence, and does his guardian sin if he does not do it?

The Shaykh : As for the fasting of Ramadan, no one fasts on behalf of another. The hadith reported from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in his saying
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: If anyone dies in a state (that he had to complete) some fasts, his heir must fast on his behalf. من مات و عليه صيام صام عنه وليه
Sahih Muslim 1147
refers only to the fasting of a vow, meaning a fast that is not originally obligatory from Allah (Mighty and Majestic) like Ramadan. Rather, it is a means of drawing near to Allah (Mighty and Majestic) by making a vow upon himself to fast one day or more. If he then dies and is unable to perform and fulfill his vow, his guardian fasts on his behalf. If he does not do so, he sins, because the saying of the one upon whom are peace and blessings
His guardian fasted on his behalf صام عنه وليه
is in the nature of a command, as in many texts, such as His saying (Glorified and Exalted is He)
so whoever has made Hajj obligatory upon himself therein [by entering the state of ihram], there is [to be for him] no sexual relations and no disobedience and no disputing during Hajj فمن فرض فيهن الحج فلا رفث و لا فسوق ولا جدال في الحج
[Al-Baqarah 2:197]
meaning it is not permissible. And "his guardian fasted on his behalf" means he is commanded to perform this fasting. The phrase
His guardian fasted on his behalf صام عنه وليه
is a declarative sentence; "fasted" means the fasting took place, and this is not what he actually fasted, so it is an affirmation of the obligation of the fasting, meaning it is as if it is a realized fact. Therefore, he said
His guardian fasted on his behalf صام عنه وليه
. It appears to me that this expression, in terms of Arabic expression, is more eloquent than if he had said "let his guardian fast on his behalf."
His guardian fasted on his behalf صام عنه وليه
reports on a command that will occur, because it is in the nature of having occurred. This is like His saying (Glorified and Exalted is He)
The command of Allah is coming, so be not impatient for it أتى أمر الله فلا تستعجلوه
[An-Nahl 16:1]
"has come," meaning it will certainly come, and therefore He expressed it with a past tense verb. Likewise
The Hour has drawn near اقتربت الساعة
and similar verses. This is an affirmation that this fasting is from the guardian of the deceased, and he has a vow of fasting upon him, so he must fast on his behalf. Yes.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas