Continuation of the Benefit

The Shaykh : And in this hadith there is evidence that human blood is pure. Where is this taken from? From the fact that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not order it to be washed when it flowed, whereas he ordered urine to be washed when As for this, he did not order it to be washed.
And this is evidence that it is not impure. If someone were to say that the absence of a report is not a report of absence, we would say that this is only valid in what is established in principle, and here it has not been established that human blood is impure. If someone were to say, "Is not We say: Yes, but who says that this was for the sake of impurity? Rather, this was for the removal of blood from the face, because this disfigures the face. The conclusion is that there is no clear evidence that human blood is impure, except what comes out of the two passages, meaning from the anus or the front passage. As for anything else, there is no evidence indicating impurity; rather, analogy indicates its purity, because the corpse of a human is pure, and anything whose corpse is pure, its blood is pure, as evidenced by fish. Fish has blood, and its blood is pure because its corpse is pure. Furthermore, if a limb is cut from a human, that limb is pure, and it is known that a limb usually contains blood. If a limb that has no ... other than it is pure, then blood is all the more so. It has not become clear to me up to now that human blood is impure, but whoever washes it or avoids it out of caution, that is good, and there is nothing wrong with it.