By Allah, no one has reason who has sold what *** remains for what is perishing, so (the condemnation of this world)
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"By Allah, no one has reason who has sold what *** remains for what is perishing, so I am"
I swear that reason is absent from a person who sold what remains for what is perishing, so he is like one... who has no reason, and he also has no religion with him.
"This one issues fatwas, then a judge rules *** on the interdiction of this foolish person"
Yes, meaning this one who sold what remains for what perishes, you will find him issuing fatwas and ruling that whoever prioritizes the Hereafter over this world is a fool who is placed under interdiction, just as the owner of wealth is placed under interdiction, and the reason for the obligation of interdiction or the ruling of interdiction.
"For he sold a thing he valued above what *** he receives in exchange from these prices"
Yes, he says this is the correct view. Ibn al-Qayyim said:
"So the truly foolish one, if you have *** reason, and where is the reason of the drunkard?"
Is the fool the one who sold the Hereafter for this world, or the one who sold this world for the Hereafter?
The student: He sold the Hereafter.
The Shaykh : The first one and not the second?
The student: The second.
The student: The first one.
The Shaykh : The one who sold the Hereafter for this world, or this world for the Hereafter?
The student: The first one.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The first one.
The Shaykh : The first one, yes. The one who took this world in exchange for the Hereafter is the fool, and the first one is, yes, the one who took this world in exchange for the Hereafter is the fool, and the one who took the Hereafter in exchange for this world is the sane, prudent person.
I swear that reason is absent from a person who sold what remains for what is perishing, so he is like one... who has no reason, and he also has no religion with him.
"This one issues fatwas, then a judge rules *** on the interdiction of this foolish person"
Yes, meaning this one who sold what remains for what perishes, you will find him issuing fatwas and ruling that whoever prioritizes the Hereafter over this world is a fool who is placed under interdiction, just as the owner of wealth is placed under interdiction, and the reason for the obligation of interdiction or the ruling of interdiction.
"For he sold a thing he valued above what *** he receives in exchange from these prices"
Yes, he says this is the correct view. Ibn al-Qayyim said:
"So the truly foolish one, if you have *** reason, and where is the reason of the drunkard?"
Is the fool the one who sold the Hereafter for this world, or the one who sold this world for the Hereafter?
The student: He sold the Hereafter.
The Shaykh : The first one and not the second?
The student: The second.
The student: The first one.
The Shaykh : The one who sold the Hereafter for this world, or this world for the Hereafter?
The student: The first one.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: The first one.
The Shaykh : The first one, yes. The one who took this world in exchange for the Hereafter is the fool, and the first one is, yes, the one who took this world in exchange for the Hereafter is the fool, and the one who took the Hereafter in exchange for this world is the sane, prudent person.