Is the statement (three things follow the deceased) an instance of linguistic predominance?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : O Shaykh, is the statement in the hadith an instance of linguistic predominance?
The Shaykh : Which of them? Who follows the three?
The questioner : Three things follow the deceased.
The Shaykh : No, three things follow every deceased person.
The questioner : O Shaykh: there is a statement here.
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The questioner : After explaining the first hadith.
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The questioner : The relevance of the hadith to the chapter. After explaining the first hadith, he spoke for a line, then the hadith, and then he said: "In the hadith, the severity of death does not indicate a deficiency in rank; rather, for the believer, it is either an increase in his good deeds or an expiation for his sins. With this explanation, the relevance of the hadiths of the chapter to the title becomes apparent."
The Shaykh : It does not become apparent. I say it does not become apparent, because the hadiths, whether death was severe for him or not, we have taken three.
Three things follow the deceased
يتبع الميت ثلاثةThe Shaykh : Which of them? Who follows the three?
The questioner : Three things follow the deceased.
The Shaykh : No, three things follow every deceased person.
The questioner : O Shaykh: there is a statement here.
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The questioner : After explaining the first hadith.
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The questioner : The relevance of the hadith to the chapter. After explaining the first hadith, he spoke for a line, then the hadith
The Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) had a water jar or a container with water in front of him—he was uncertain—so he would put his hand
كان الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم بين يديه ركوة أو علبة فيها ماء -يشك -فجعل يدخل يدهThe Shaykh : It does not become apparent. I say it does not become apparent, because the hadiths, whether death was severe for him or not, we have taken three.