Is it valid for some to justify the prohibition of eating in the utensils of disbelievers by saying that they cook pork in them?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Shaykh, may Allah reward you. In the hadith where the command was given... some of them might be used for drinking, so what is the operative cause in... even though what is prohibited is...
The Shaykh : May Allah bless you. The hadith did not mention that. What is mentioned in the two Sahihs is the reason, but not that pork is cooked in them. And whoever says that the Messenger commanded washing them because pork is cooked in them is mistaken, for the hadith is general regarding cooking utensils and drinking vessels; it is general.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : This is possible. It can be said, were it not for the fact that it is established that their dung and urine are ritually impure. Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, the permissibility of delegating the transmission of knowledge. Yes, this is derived from it. Yes.
The questioner : ... The hadith of al-Khatib and the hadith that is with us.
The Shaykh : The Messenger said:.
The questioner : I did not understand how it affects the meaning.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Even if they are separated, but what appeared to me?
The Shaykh : The difference is that if he says "and whoever disobeys them" in an independent sentence, to whom does the pronoun refer? This is an independent sentence, but "they forbid you," the pronoun refers to the subject.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : His intention is Allah and His Messenger, but the sentence is independent in its wording.
The questioner : Shaykh, may Allah reward you. In the hadith where the command was given... some of them might be used for drinking, so what is the operative cause in... even though what is prohibited is...
The Shaykh : May Allah bless you. The hadith did not mention that. What is mentioned in the two Sahihs is the reason, but not that pork is cooked in them. And whoever says that the Messenger commanded washing them because pork is cooked in them is mistaken, for the hadith is general regarding cooking utensils and drinking vessels; it is general.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : This is possible. It can be said, were it not for the fact that it is established that their dung and urine are ritually impure. Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, the permissibility of delegating the transmission of knowledge. Yes, this is derived from it. Yes.
The questioner : ... The hadith of al-Khatib and the hadith that is with us.
The Shaykh : The Messenger said:
You are a bad orator for your people
بئس خطيب القوم أنتThe questioner : I did not understand how it affects the meaning.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Even if they are separated, but what appeared to me?
The Shaykh : The difference is that if he says "and whoever disobeys them" in an independent sentence, to whom does the pronoun refer? This is an independent sentence, but "they forbid you," the pronoun refers to the subject.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : His intention is Allah and His Messenger, but the sentence is independent in its wording.