He says: I performed 'Umrah in the first part of Shawwal, then I went to Tabuk and entered the Haram from the miqat, because I consider myself a mutamatti' from 'Umrah to Hajj. What is the ruling?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : He says: I performed 'Umrah in the first part of Shawwal, then I went to Tabuk and entered the Haram from the miqat, because I consider myself a mutamatti' from 'Umrah to Hajj. What is the ruling on my passing the miqat with this intention without entering the state of ihram?
The Shaykh : What I understood from his words is that he performed 'Umrah first.
The questioner : Yes, he performed 'Umrah in the first part of Shawwal, as he said: I performed 'Umrah in the first part of Shawwal, then I went to Tabuk.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And he entered the Haram, but he passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram again.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : In a case like this, we say: if his 'Umrah was in Shawwal.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : With the intention of Hajj this year, then he is a mutamatti', because he combined 'Umrah with Hajj. In that case, if he goes to Tabuk and then returns, he must not pass the miqat without being in the state of ihram. However, as long as his intention is to return, but he reached Tabuk due to an excuse or a purpose, and his intention is to return to Makkah, there is no blame on him for entering Makkah and staying there until the eighth day of Dhu al-Hijjah arrives, when he enters the state of ihram from his location.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : As for if he entered Makkah in Shawwal and his intention was not to perform Hajj this year, but he came only to perform 'Umrah, and then he returned to Tabuk, then if he returns to Makkah, he must not pass the miqat without being in the state of ihram.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Because it was not his intention to return to Makkah in this journey.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : So, 'Abd al-'Aziz al-'Abdullah from al-Mahmal owes nothing when he passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram.
The Shaykh : Yes, as long as he remained with his first intention, intending to perform Hajj.
The questioner : Because he says: And I entered from the miqat because I consider myself a mutamatti' from 'Umrah to Hajj?
The Shaykh : Yes, that is correct.
The questioner : Meaning, with his 'Umrah in the first part of the month.
The Shaykh : So, he owes nothing.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The Shaykh : What I understood from his words is that he performed 'Umrah first.
The questioner : Yes, he performed 'Umrah in the first part of Shawwal, as he said: I performed 'Umrah in the first part of Shawwal, then I went to Tabuk.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And he entered the Haram, but he passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram again.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : In a case like this, we say: if his 'Umrah was in Shawwal.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : With the intention of Hajj this year, then he is a mutamatti', because he combined 'Umrah with Hajj. In that case, if he goes to Tabuk and then returns, he must not pass the miqat without being in the state of ihram. However, as long as his intention is to return, but he reached Tabuk due to an excuse or a purpose, and his intention is to return to Makkah, there is no blame on him for entering Makkah and staying there until the eighth day of Dhu al-Hijjah arrives, when he enters the state of ihram from his location.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : As for if he entered Makkah in Shawwal and his intention was not to perform Hajj this year, but he came only to perform 'Umrah, and then he returned to Tabuk, then if he returns to Makkah, he must not pass the miqat without being in the state of ihram.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Because it was not his intention to return to Makkah in this journey.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : So, 'Abd al-'Aziz al-'Abdullah from al-Mahmal owes nothing when he passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram.
The Shaykh : Yes, as long as he remained with his first intention, intending to perform Hajj.
The questioner : Because he says: And I entered from the miqat because I consider myself a mutamatti' from 'Umrah to Hajj?
The Shaykh : Yes, that is correct.
The questioner : Meaning, with his 'Umrah in the first part of the month.
The Shaykh : So, he owes nothing.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes.