What is the difference between *lazim al-sadr* and *haqq al-sadr*?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Did the *lam* enter the *mubtada*?
The Shaykh : There is a difference between them. The difference is that the first condition is when the predicate is attached to a *mubtada* with the *lam* of beginning, and the second condition is when the predicate is attached to a *mubtada* that is *lazim al-sadr*. That is the difference. You asked about this yesterday and we explained it to you. Now, the important point is his statement:
"or *lazim al-sadr*": this means, or was the predicate attached to what? To *lazim al-sadr*. It does not mean "one who is *lazim al-sadr*" as some of you said, but the meaning is: attached to what? To *lazim al-sadr*, meaning to a *mubtada* that must come first. Good.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Is there anything, Abdullah?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : The one who says: ...
The Shaykh : There is a difference between them. The difference is that the first condition is when the predicate is attached to a *mubtada* with the *lam* of beginning, and the second condition is when the predicate is attached to a *mubtada* that is *lazim al-sadr*. That is the difference. You asked about this yesterday and we explained it to you. Now, the important point is his statement:
"or *lazim al-sadr*": this means, or was the predicate attached to what? To *lazim al-sadr*. It does not mean "one who is *lazim al-sadr*" as some of you said, but the meaning is: attached to what? To *lazim al-sadr*, meaning to a *mubtada* that must come first. Good.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Is there anything, Abdullah?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : The one who says: ...