In the author's statement: "Or he bought something for cash without having sold it on credit, not the reverse."

The questioner : Buying something for cash without having sold it on credit, not the reverse, is based on one of the two possibilities, not the reverse of the form of the buy-back sale.

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : I ... like the form, the form of the buy-back sale. Its origin is that one sells something for cash.

The Shaykh : No.

The questioner : That he sells something on credit.

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : Then he buys it back for cash for less than what he sold it for.

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : We said not its reverse, meaning the reverse of this form.

The Shaykh : For more, meaning it has two possibilities: the reverse of the form or the reverse of the lesser amount.

The questioner : Not the reverse of the form, that is what I mean.

The Shaykh : Okay, it does not contradict.

The questioner : The reverse of the form means I buy something for cash for less.

The Shaykh : How?

The questioner : He buys, meaning a commodity, a car, for twenty thousand.

The Shaykh : And he sold it for cash.

The questioner : That he sells it for cash for twenty thousand, then buys it on credit for more. This form is the same as the first form, but this is the buyer's form.

The Shaykh : This is the reverse, the reverse of the form. The first form sold on credit then bought for cash, and this one sold for cash then bought on credit.

The questioner : This is the same second party.

The Shaykh : The important thing is that this is the reverse ... .

The questioner : It is the same issue, O Shaykh ..

The Shaykh : No, O Shaykh, it is not the same issue. Think about it while you are, if Allah wills, lying on your bed, relaxed and at ease, and then come back.

The questioner : The time is up, O Shaykh.

The Shaykh : It has ended.