Qiran is not Tamattu', so is the sacrificial animal obligatory in both?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Qiran is not Tamattu', so is the sacrificial animal obligatory in both?
The Shaykh : Correct. Qiran is called Tamattu' because it is a form of Tamattu' where one of the two journeys is dropped. But does the verse[Al-Baqarah 2:196] indicate the separation of 'Umrah from Hajj, or not? Now, if Hajj is separated from 'Umrah, a complete Tamattu' is achieved and one exits the state of ihram. But one who performs Tamattu' with 'Umrah up to Hajj, meaning with Hajj, because Qiran is not Tamattu' with 'Umrah up to Hajj, but rather Tamattu' with 'Umrah alongside Hajj, so he does not obtain this Tamattu' by which he enjoys himself and indulges.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, linguistically it is prohibited according to many scholars. But let us leave the linguistic aspect. Let us say that the term Tamattu' linguistically applies to combining Hajj and 'Umrah in one journey. But if Allah says[Al-Baqarah 2:196], is the separation clear?
The questioner : ... those who did not bring their sacrificial animals?
The Shaykh : He commanded them to perform Tamattu'.
The questioner : But does this not apply to the one who performs Qiran and did not bring the sacrificial animal?
The Shaykh : Yes, it applies to the one who performs Qiran and did not bring the sacrificial animal, that he should make it an 'Umrah.
The questioner : But he commanded them to fast.
The Shaykh : How did he command them to fast? In the Qur'an it says[Al-Baqarah 2:196], so the original ruling is the obligation of the sacrificial animal.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : He commanded the one who did not bring the sacrificial animal to make it an 'Umrah. But did he command the one who performed Qiran and did not bring the sacrificial animal to slaughter a sacrificial animal, and if he does not find one, to fast? If this is the case, then it is decisive.
The Shaykh : Correct. Qiran is called Tamattu' because it is a form of Tamattu' where one of the two journeys is dropped. But does the verse
whoever performs 'umrah [during the Hajj months] followed by Hajj
فمن تمتع بالعمرة إلى الحجThe questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, linguistically it is prohibited according to many scholars. But let us leave the linguistic aspect. Let us say that the term Tamattu' linguistically applies to combining Hajj and 'Umrah in one journey. But if Allah says
whoever performs 'umrah [during the Hajj months] followed by Hajj
فمن تمتع بالعمرة إلى الحجThe questioner : ... those who did not bring their sacrificial animals?
The Shaykh : He commanded them to perform Tamattu'.
The questioner : But does this not apply to the one who performs Qiran and did not bring the sacrificial animal?
The Shaykh : Yes, it applies to the one who performs Qiran and did not bring the sacrificial animal, that he should make it an 'Umrah.
The questioner : But he commanded them to fast.
The Shaykh : How did he command them to fast? In the Qur'an it says
And whoever cannot find [or afford such an animal] - then a fast of three days during Hajj and of seven when you have returned
فمن لم يجد فصيام ثلاثة أيام في الحج وسبعة إذا رجعتمThe questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : He commanded the one who did not bring the sacrificial animal to make it an 'Umrah. But did he command the one who performed Qiran and did not bring the sacrificial animal to slaughter a sacrificial animal, and if he does not find one, to fast? If this is the case, then it is decisive.