The discussion regarding the negating "la" (la nafiyah al-jins)?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : But al-Mansur clarifies for us what is singular and what is not?
The student: Yusuf.
The Shaykh : Yes, Yusuf ibn 'Abd Allah ibn al-Mansur, good.
The student: Yes, regarding the singular.
The Shaykh : Yes, what is the singular?
The student: The singular is that which is not moved.
The Shaykh : That is not attached, or?
The student: That is not attached, or.
The Shaykh : Similar?
The student: Similar to the attached.
The Shaykh : Good, this is the singular and what is not?
The student: It is similar to the attached, or the attached.
The Shaykh : Or the attached, well done, good. An example of the attached, what is the example of the attached? Yes, that is right.
The student: I did not attend.
The Shaykh : Did you attend except today? Good, Ahmad?
The student: There is no boy of Zayd.
The Shaykh : No, because if you said: There is no boy of Zayd, it becomes definite.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : It becomes definite and the nominative case is obligatory.
The student: There is no boy of a man in the house.
The Shaykh : There is no boy of a man in the house, correct? Good, there is no boy of Zayd?
The student: An error.
The Shaykh : Incorrect, because it becomes definite, and it does not operate on definites. If you say: There is no boy of Zayd, you must say: There is no boy of Zayd, yes, good. There is no boy of Zayd, a man in the house, parse it?
The student: La: negating the genus, Ghulam: the name of la, built on the open case, and it is attached, and Zayd is the attached-to, in the genitive case, and the sign of its genitive is the visible kasrah on its end.
The Shaykh : Yes, in the house?
The student: In the house, in is a preposition, and the house is a noun in the genitive case.
The Shaykh : In the genitive case by what?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : In the genitive case by what?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the sign of its genitive is the visible kasrah on its end, and the preposition and the genitive noun are connected to a deleted predicate.
The Shaykh : Well done, complete. The similar to the attached, Khalid?
The student: That to which something is connected that completes the meaning.
The Shaykh : That to which something is connected?
The student: That completes the meaning.
The Shaykh : That completes the meaning, good, an example?
The student: There is no wrongdoer, there is no one ascending the mountain.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: There is no one ascending the mountain.
The Shaykh : The speech is not complete.
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : The speech is not complete, there is no one ascending the mountain.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: Meaning except strong.
The Shaykh : Hehe.
The student: The meaning is not complete?
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: It is not complete?
The Shaykh : No, there is no one ascending the mountain.
The student: Yes, I said except strong.
The Shaykh : It does not contradict, meaning complete, present, for example.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Present or weak?
The student: And present?
The Shaykh : The one who is ascending the mountain?
The student: Yes, I said except strong.
The Shaykh : Good, does anyone say there is no one ascending the mountain, weak?
The student: Okay.
The Shaykh : So that we say this is except a substitute.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Good, parse it?
The student: La negating the genus.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Sa'idan is its name, in the accusative case by it.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: And the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end, yes, good. There is no one ascending the mountain, the mountain.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: There is no one ascending the mountain, this is similar to the attached.
Another student: In the accusative case as a circumstantial.
The Shaykh : What?
The student: Accusative on being an adverb.
The Shaykh : A mistake.
The student: It is an object in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : The object in the accusative case, good, and what is doing it to it?
The student: Tal'an, the subject.
The Shaykh : Sa'idan, we said Sa'idan, is there an object without a subject?
The student: The subject, this operates.
The Shaykh : Where is the subject?
The student: The name of the doer, this.
The Shaykh : Yes, the name of the doer is the operator, operating for the accusative.
The student: It operates like the verb.
The Shaykh : Like the verb, good, it puts the object in the accusative case.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : And is there an operator that puts the object in the accusative case without a subject?
The student: No, this is the subject.
The Shaykh : This is a name of the doer, it is a subject, yes.
The student: It operates like the verb.
The Shaykh : Good, it operates like the verb.
The student: And then it is not attached to an indefinite.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The student: That is it ... the object.
The Shaykh : But we need a subject, nothing can happen to the object except with a subject.
The student: But there is no verb ...
The Shaykh : Yes, if there is no verb, it is not valid to be transitive to the object.
The student: It operates this.
The Shaykh : Who knows? Khalid?
The student: Hidden.
The Shaykh : Hidden by what?
The student: By the subject.
The Shaykh : By the subject, the name of the doer is correctly hidden, come on Khalid, complete? So Sa'idan is its name, in the accusative case by it, and the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end, and its subject is hidden by permission, its estimate is?
The student: He.
The Shaykh : It, the mountain is the object.
The student: The object in the accusative case, and the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end.
The Shaykh : Yes, weak?
The student: Except there is no one ascending the mountain.
The Shaykh : Weak.
The student: Weak.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Weak.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: This is there is no one ascending the mountain, weak, this is the apparent, O Shaykh, its predicate.
The Shaykh : The predicate of what?
The student: The predicate of la.
The Shaykh : Yes, correct, this is the actual.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is by the apparent, good.
The student: This is its predicate.
The Shaykh : Its predicate is in the nominative case by it.
The student: In the nominative case by it, and the sign of its nominative is the visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : Complete, well done, come on Salman? Do you say there is no one sitting at your place, bored, or do you say there is no one sitting at your place, bored, or do you say there is no one sitting at your place, bored, three forms?
The student: No, in the nominative case.
The Shaykh : Look, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, this is one, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The student: The first two.
The Shaykh : Which one?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Correct, there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Correct, and the last is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Which one is incorrect?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is the one that is not valid?
The student: This is the apparent.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: This is the apparent, and Allah knows best.
Another student: Hehehe.
The Shaykh : Hehe.
The student: The second and the third.
The Shaykh : What is the second?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, and there is no one sitting at your place.
The Shaykh : Yes, there is no one sitting at your place, and the first is incorrect, yes.
The student: The correct one is the last, there is no one sitting at your place.
The Shaykh : The correct one is the last?
The student: The correct one is there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Ah.
The student: The correct ones are the first and the third.
The Shaykh : What is it, hehe?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is one, huh?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : All of them?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is correct.
The student: Yes, indeed.
The Shaykh : Or there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The student: This is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Or there is no one sitting at your place, bored?
The student: This is correct.
The Shaykh : Correct, so the second and the third are the correct ones.
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Look now, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, tell me, say incorrect or correct, there is no one sitting at your place, bored?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored, this is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Incorrect, there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, this is correct.
The Shaykh : This is correct, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, correct, so the second and the third are correct.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : By Allah, this is the truth ...
The student: All of them are correct.
The Shaykh : Which one?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored, the second is there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Good, fine.
The student: The first and the second.
The Shaykh : Just as the brother said, yes.
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is the correct one, yes, good, this is the correct one.
The student: The explanation of the last one.
The Shaykh : The last one? The explanation does not contradict, because you have a dependent of sitting, so it is similar to the attached, meaning it is not the one who sits at your place, bored, this is the meaning, so at your place is connected to sitting, so it is operating on it, operating in it, so if it is connected in it, it is similar to the attached, like there is no one ascending a mountain.
The student: The most correct is there is no one sitting at your place.
The Shaykh : No, the most correct is there is no one sitting at your place, because if it is similar to the attached, it is in the accusative case, it is built, good, perhaps someone will say I intend that there is no one sitting at your place, there is no one existing at your place, so in that case we say the correct one is there is no one sitting at your place, but leave this, I intended by it that it is similar to the object, similar to the attached, good, take it, O brother? We give it to you?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : No, let us give it to you and take ... it says there is no man in the house or a woman, correct or incorrect?
The student: An error.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because man and woman are a delayed subject, so man and woman in the house.
The Shaykh : I say there is no man in the house or a woman, there is no man in the house or a woman.
The student: Correct, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Correct, there is no man in the house or a woman.
The student: Its estimate is existing.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: There is no existing man in the house or a woman.
The Shaykh : Man or a woman, good.
The student: Man or a woman, there is no man in the house, it did not directly touch la.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It did not directly touch.
The Shaykh : It did not directly touch.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : So it is necessary to say there is no man in the house or a woman, why? Because it did not directly touch la.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Correct or no?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : Did you hear, O brother? If it did not directly touch la, then it is neglected in any case, it must be like what the author said, its cancellation and repetition, complete, parse there is no man in the house or a woman? Hey, parse?
The student: La is not operating.
The Shaykh : It is a negation.
The student: Not operating.
The Shaykh : Not operating, good.
The student: In the house is a preposition and a genitive noun, a preceding predicate.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Man is a delayed subject.
The Shaykh : In the nominative case?
The student: In the nominative case by the visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : In the nominative case by what? By the subject or by the beginning?
The student: A delayed subject.
The Shaykh : In the nominative case by what? The sign of its nominative is the dammah, but in the nominative case by what, what is the operator that made it in the nominative case? The subject, what do you say about its parsing?
The student: It is raised by the dammah.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is raised by the dammah, it is raised by the waw, it is raised by the alif.
The student: By the beginning, because it is singular.
The Shaykh : So it is raised by the beginning, raised by the beginning. Now, good, continue. And what is its sign of being raised?
The student: The visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : Yes, and "not a woman"?
The student: The waw is a conjunction.
The Shaykh : Correct, and "not"?
The student: A negating "not".
The Shaykh : Is it operative or non-operative?
The student: Non-operative.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Woman" is conjoined to a raised noun, which is raised.
The Shaykh : Conjoined to "man".
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : And the noun conjoined to a raised noun is raised, and what is its sign of being raised?
The student: The visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : Well done. Good. And what is your question?
The student: My question is, not "a man" with you, but "sitting" with you.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: You have a noun in the genitive case and a preposition.
The Shaykh : An adverb of place.
The student: An adverb.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: So is the definition of that that it is definite, as long as it is attached to "with you"?
The Shaykh : No, it is not attached to "with you".
The student: Not "sitting"?
The Shaykh : Yes, "with you" here is not attached to anything; nothing is attached to it.
The student: And its implied meaning is "no sitting person exists"?
The Shaykh : No, the correct answer is what we said: "No sitting person with you is bored."
The student: In the accusative case.
The Shaykh : Yes, in the accusative case, yes, because it is similar to a noun in the genitive case. Come on, Abdullah? Abdullah or Muhammad?
The student: Abd al-Qadir, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: Abd al-Qadir.
The Shaykh : Abd al-Qadir, come on, Abd al-Qadir? What do you say about the statement of the one who says: "La hawla wa la quwwata" or "wa la quwwatan"?
The student: "La quwwata".
The Shaykh : Here.
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : And "quwwata" or "quwwatan"? Two ways?
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : And "quwwata" with the nominative case only, and the one who said "la hawla wa la quwwatan"?
The student: It is permissible.
The Shaykh : And why do you say "only"?
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : "La hawla wa la quwwata", and is any other way permissible?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwatan".
The Shaykh : Here, and any other way?
The student: There is no power and no strength except with Allah.
The Shaykh : What is the third way?
The student: Yes, "La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah", "la hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : Clarify, start from the beginning?
The student: There is no power and no strength except with Allah.
The Shaykh : And "quwwah"?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Now, that is one.
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwatan illa billah".
The Shaykh : "La hawla wa la quwwatan"?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : "Illa billah", these are two.
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah"
The Shaykh : Did the second one differ from the one before it? Or not? "La hawla wa la"?
The student: "Quwwatan".
The Shaykh : "Quwwatan" without tanween?
The student: No, there is no tanween.
The Shaykh : There is no tanween.
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : What?
The student: It is the predicate of "it".
The Shaykh : The example we have, my brother, is "La hawla wa la quwwatan illa billah", just correct?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : So three ways are permissible for the second one, permissible for the second one?
The student: The first.
The Shaykh : The first one is open and built on the fathah: "La hawla".
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Is it permissible for the second one?
The student: Two ways.
The Shaykh : And what do you say, Ibrahim?
The student: I was not present.
The Shaykh : You were not present? How did you miss this review? This is important.
The student: Three ways are permissible.
The Shaykh : If the first one is built on the fathah, three ways are permissible for the second one, are they?
The student: The accusative case.
The Shaykh : The accusative case.
The student: And the raised vowel (raf').
The Shaykh : And the nominative case.
The student: And the building.
The Shaykh : And building on the fathah. Do you understand, my brothers? Do not send me back to the beginning. We mentioned that if the first one is built on the fathah, three ways are permissible for the second one. If the first one is raised, two ways are permissible for the second one. Ibn Malik says:
"Both 'hawla' and 'quwwata', and make the second *** Raised or accusative or compound
And if you raise the first, do not make it accusative *** ..."
It is known, everyone. Do you understand, Salman?
The student: If Allah wills.
The Shaykh : Good, the summary now is that if "la" is repeated and it is directly for an indefinite noun, two ways are permissible for the first one: building, and if you wish, call it composition. And if you compose it, is it permissible for the second one?
The student: Three options.
The Shaykh : Three ways. The second is the nominative case, the second way is the nominative case in the first one. So if you raise in the first one, is it permissible for the second one?
The student: Two aspects.
The Shaykh : Only two ways.
The student: Yusuf.
The Shaykh : Yes, Yusuf ibn 'Abd Allah ibn al-Mansur, good.
The student: Yes, regarding the singular.
The Shaykh : Yes, what is the singular?
The student: The singular is that which is not moved.
The Shaykh : That is not attached, or?
The student: That is not attached, or.
The Shaykh : Similar?
The student: Similar to the attached.
The Shaykh : Good, this is the singular and what is not?
The student: It is similar to the attached, or the attached.
The Shaykh : Or the attached, well done, good. An example of the attached, what is the example of the attached? Yes, that is right.
The student: I did not attend.
The Shaykh : Did you attend except today? Good, Ahmad?
The student: There is no boy of Zayd.
The Shaykh : No, because if you said: There is no boy of Zayd, it becomes definite.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : It becomes definite and the nominative case is obligatory.
The student: There is no boy of a man in the house.
The Shaykh : There is no boy of a man in the house, correct? Good, there is no boy of Zayd?
The student: An error.
The Shaykh : Incorrect, because it becomes definite, and it does not operate on definites. If you say: There is no boy of Zayd, you must say: There is no boy of Zayd, yes, good. There is no boy of Zayd, a man in the house, parse it?
The student: La: negating the genus, Ghulam: the name of la, built on the open case, and it is attached, and Zayd is the attached-to, in the genitive case, and the sign of its genitive is the visible kasrah on its end.
The Shaykh : Yes, in the house?
The student: In the house, in is a preposition, and the house is a noun in the genitive case.
The Shaykh : In the genitive case by what?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : In the genitive case by what?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: And the sign of its genitive is the visible kasrah on its end, and the preposition and the genitive noun are connected to a deleted predicate.
The Shaykh : Well done, complete. The similar to the attached, Khalid?
The student: That to which something is connected that completes the meaning.
The Shaykh : That to which something is connected?
The student: That completes the meaning.
The Shaykh : That completes the meaning, good, an example?
The student: There is no wrongdoer, there is no one ascending the mountain.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: There is no one ascending the mountain.
The Shaykh : The speech is not complete.
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : The speech is not complete, there is no one ascending the mountain.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: Meaning except strong.
The Shaykh : Hehe.
The student: The meaning is not complete?
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: It is not complete?
The Shaykh : No, there is no one ascending the mountain.
The student: Yes, I said except strong.
The Shaykh : It does not contradict, meaning complete, present, for example.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Present or weak?
The student: And present?
The Shaykh : The one who is ascending the mountain?
The student: Yes, I said except strong.
The Shaykh : Good, does anyone say there is no one ascending the mountain, weak?
The student: Okay.
The Shaykh : So that we say this is except a substitute.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Good, parse it?
The student: La negating the genus.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Sa'idan is its name, in the accusative case by it.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: And the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end, yes, good. There is no one ascending the mountain, the mountain.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: There is no one ascending the mountain, this is similar to the attached.
Another student: In the accusative case as a circumstantial.
The Shaykh : What?
The student: Accusative on being an adverb.
The Shaykh : A mistake.
The student: It is an object in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : The object in the accusative case, good, and what is doing it to it?
The student: Tal'an, the subject.
The Shaykh : Sa'idan, we said Sa'idan, is there an object without a subject?
The student: The subject, this operates.
The Shaykh : Where is the subject?
The student: The name of the doer, this.
The Shaykh : Yes, the name of the doer is the operator, operating for the accusative.
The student: It operates like the verb.
The Shaykh : Like the verb, good, it puts the object in the accusative case.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : And is there an operator that puts the object in the accusative case without a subject?
The student: No, this is the subject.
The Shaykh : This is a name of the doer, it is a subject, yes.
The student: It operates like the verb.
The Shaykh : Good, it operates like the verb.
The student: And then it is not attached to an indefinite.
The Shaykh : Fine.
The student: That is it ... the object.
The Shaykh : But we need a subject, nothing can happen to the object except with a subject.
The student: But there is no verb ...
The Shaykh : Yes, if there is no verb, it is not valid to be transitive to the object.
The student: It operates this.
The Shaykh : Who knows? Khalid?
The student: Hidden.
The Shaykh : Hidden by what?
The student: By the subject.
The Shaykh : By the subject, the name of the doer is correctly hidden, come on Khalid, complete? So Sa'idan is its name, in the accusative case by it, and the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end, and its subject is hidden by permission, its estimate is?
The student: He.
The Shaykh : It, the mountain is the object.
The student: The object in the accusative case, and the sign of its accusative is the visible fathah on its end.
The Shaykh : Yes, weak?
The student: Except there is no one ascending the mountain.
The Shaykh : Weak.
The student: Weak.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Weak.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: This is there is no one ascending the mountain, weak, this is the apparent, O Shaykh, its predicate.
The Shaykh : The predicate of what?
The student: The predicate of la.
The Shaykh : Yes, correct, this is the actual.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is by the apparent, good.
The student: This is its predicate.
The Shaykh : Its predicate is in the nominative case by it.
The student: In the nominative case by it, and the sign of its nominative is the visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : Complete, well done, come on Salman? Do you say there is no one sitting at your place, bored, or do you say there is no one sitting at your place, bored, or do you say there is no one sitting at your place, bored, three forms?
The student: No, in the nominative case.
The Shaykh : Look, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, this is one, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The student: The first two.
The Shaykh : Which one?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Correct, there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Correct, and the last is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Which one is incorrect?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is the one that is not valid?
The student: This is the apparent.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: This is the apparent, and Allah knows best.
Another student: Hehehe.
The Shaykh : Hehe.
The student: The second and the third.
The Shaykh : What is the second?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, and there is no one sitting at your place.
The Shaykh : Yes, there is no one sitting at your place, and the first is incorrect, yes.
The student: The correct one is the last, there is no one sitting at your place.
The Shaykh : The correct one is the last?
The student: The correct one is there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Ah.
The student: The correct ones are the first and the third.
The Shaykh : What is it, hehe?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is one, huh?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : All of them?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is correct.
The student: Yes, indeed.
The Shaykh : Or there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The student: This is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Or there is no one sitting at your place, bored?
The student: This is correct.
The Shaykh : Correct, so the second and the third are the correct ones.
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Look now, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, tell me, say incorrect or correct, there is no one sitting at your place, bored?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored, this is incorrect.
The Shaykh : Incorrect, there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, this is correct.
The Shaykh : This is correct, there is no one sitting at your place, bored, correct, so the second and the third are correct.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : By Allah, this is the truth ...
The student: All of them are correct.
The Shaykh : Which one?
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored, the second is there is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : Good, fine.
The student: The first and the second.
The Shaykh : Just as the brother said, yes.
The student: There is no one sitting at your place, bored.
The Shaykh : This is the correct one, yes, good, this is the correct one.
The student: The explanation of the last one.
The Shaykh : The last one? The explanation does not contradict, because you have a dependent of sitting, so it is similar to the attached, meaning it is not the one who sits at your place, bored, this is the meaning, so at your place is connected to sitting, so it is operating on it, operating in it, so if it is connected in it, it is similar to the attached, like there is no one ascending a mountain.
The student: The most correct is there is no one sitting at your place.
The Shaykh : No, the most correct is there is no one sitting at your place, because if it is similar to the attached, it is in the accusative case, it is built, good, perhaps someone will say I intend that there is no one sitting at your place, there is no one existing at your place, so in that case we say the correct one is there is no one sitting at your place, but leave this, I intended by it that it is similar to the object, similar to the attached, good, take it, O brother? We give it to you?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : No, let us give it to you and take ... it says there is no man in the house or a woman, correct or incorrect?
The student: An error.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because man and woman are a delayed subject, so man and woman in the house.
The Shaykh : I say there is no man in the house or a woman, there is no man in the house or a woman.
The student: Correct, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Correct, there is no man in the house or a woman.
The student: Its estimate is existing.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: There is no existing man in the house or a woman.
The Shaykh : Man or a woman, good.
The student: Man or a woman, there is no man in the house, it did not directly touch la.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It did not directly touch.
The Shaykh : It did not directly touch.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : So it is necessary to say there is no man in the house or a woman, why? Because it did not directly touch la.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Correct or no?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : Did you hear, O brother? If it did not directly touch la, then it is neglected in any case, it must be like what the author said, its cancellation and repetition, complete, parse there is no man in the house or a woman? Hey, parse?
The student: La is not operating.
The Shaykh : It is a negation.
The student: Not operating.
The Shaykh : Not operating, good.
The student: In the house is a preposition and a genitive noun, a preceding predicate.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Man is a delayed subject.
The Shaykh : In the nominative case?
The student: In the nominative case by the visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : In the nominative case by what? By the subject or by the beginning?
The student: A delayed subject.
The Shaykh : In the nominative case by what? The sign of its nominative is the dammah, but in the nominative case by what, what is the operator that made it in the nominative case? The subject, what do you say about its parsing?
The student: It is raised by the dammah.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is raised by the dammah, it is raised by the waw, it is raised by the alif.
The student: By the beginning, because it is singular.
The Shaykh : So it is raised by the beginning, raised by the beginning. Now, good, continue. And what is its sign of being raised?
The student: The visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : Yes, and "not a woman"?
The student: The waw is a conjunction.
The Shaykh : Correct, and "not"?
The student: A negating "not".
The Shaykh : Is it operative or non-operative?
The student: Non-operative.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: "Woman" is conjoined to a raised noun, which is raised.
The Shaykh : Conjoined to "man".
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : And the noun conjoined to a raised noun is raised, and what is its sign of being raised?
The student: The visible dammah on its end.
The Shaykh : Well done. Good. And what is your question?
The student: My question is, not "a man" with you, but "sitting" with you.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: You have a noun in the genitive case and a preposition.
The Shaykh : An adverb of place.
The student: An adverb.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: So is the definition of that that it is definite, as long as it is attached to "with you"?
The Shaykh : No, it is not attached to "with you".
The student: Not "sitting"?
The Shaykh : Yes, "with you" here is not attached to anything; nothing is attached to it.
The student: And its implied meaning is "no sitting person exists"?
The Shaykh : No, the correct answer is what we said: "No sitting person with you is bored."
The student: In the accusative case.
The Shaykh : Yes, in the accusative case, yes, because it is similar to a noun in the genitive case. Come on, Abdullah? Abdullah or Muhammad?
The student: Abd al-Qadir, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: Abd al-Qadir.
The Shaykh : Abd al-Qadir, come on, Abd al-Qadir? What do you say about the statement of the one who says: "La hawla wa la quwwata" or "wa la quwwatan"?
The student: "La quwwata".
The Shaykh : Here.
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : And "quwwata" or "quwwatan"? Two ways?
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : And "quwwata" with the nominative case only, and the one who said "la hawla wa la quwwatan"?
The student: It is permissible.
The Shaykh : And why do you say "only"?
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : "La hawla wa la quwwata", and is any other way permissible?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwatan".
The Shaykh : Here, and any other way?
The student: There is no power and no strength except with Allah.
The Shaykh : What is the third way?
The student: Yes, "La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah", "la hawla wa la quwwata".
The Shaykh : Clarify, start from the beginning?
The student: There is no power and no strength except with Allah.
The Shaykh : And "quwwah"?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Now, that is one.
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwatan illa billah".
The Shaykh : "La hawla wa la quwwatan"?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : "Illa billah", these are two.
The student: "La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah"
The Shaykh : Did the second one differ from the one before it? Or not? "La hawla wa la"?
The student: "Quwwatan".
The Shaykh : "Quwwatan" without tanween?
The student: No, there is no tanween.
The Shaykh : There is no tanween.
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : Hm?
The student: It is a predicate (khabar).
The Shaykh : What?
The student: It is the predicate of "it".
The Shaykh : The example we have, my brother, is "La hawla wa la quwwatan illa billah", just correct?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : So three ways are permissible for the second one, permissible for the second one?
The student: The first.
The Shaykh : The first one is open and built on the fathah: "La hawla".
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Is it permissible for the second one?
The student: Two ways.
The Shaykh : And what do you say, Ibrahim?
The student: I was not present.
The Shaykh : You were not present? How did you miss this review? This is important.
The student: Three ways are permissible.
The Shaykh : If the first one is built on the fathah, three ways are permissible for the second one, are they?
The student: The accusative case.
The Shaykh : The accusative case.
The student: And the raised vowel (raf').
The Shaykh : And the nominative case.
The student: And the building.
The Shaykh : And building on the fathah. Do you understand, my brothers? Do not send me back to the beginning. We mentioned that if the first one is built on the fathah, three ways are permissible for the second one. If the first one is raised, two ways are permissible for the second one. Ibn Malik says:
"Both 'hawla' and 'quwwata', and make the second *** Raised or accusative or compound
And if you raise the first, do not make it accusative *** ..."
It is known, everyone. Do you understand, Salman?
The student: If Allah wills.
The Shaykh : Good, the summary now is that if "la" is repeated and it is directly for an indefinite noun, two ways are permissible for the first one: building, and if you wish, call it composition. And if you compose it, is it permissible for the second one?
The student: Three options.
The Shaykh : Three ways. The second is the nominative case, the second way is the nominative case in the first one. So if you raise in the first one, is it permissible for the second one?
The student: Two aspects.
The Shaykh : Only two ways.