Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes.
The reader: "If the one being called is added to something added to the yaa of the speaker, it is obligatory to keep the yaa, except in 'son of my mother' and 'son of my uncle,' where the yaa is deleted from both due to frequent usage, and the mimm is broken or opened, so you say".
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: "The mimm is broken or opened, so you say: 'O son of my mother, come forward' and 'O son of my mother, come forward,' and 'O son of my uncle, there is no escape,' with the mimm opened and broken".
In the marginal note, it says: "The presence of the yaa in 'O son of my mother' has been reported in the words of Abu Jaliyib al-Tai, mourning his brother: 'O son of my mother, and O brother of my soul *** You have left me in a severe age'".
The Shaykh : And it was reported!
The student: "And the conversion of the yaa to an alif and its retention in 'daughter of my uncle,' due to the words of Abu al-Najm: 'O daughter of my uncle, do not blame me'".
The Shaykh : And the grammatical analysis?
The student: The grammatical analysis in the vocative: "And in the vocative".
The Shaykh : No, no, before that, look at the grammatical analysis of the alfiyyah, what does it say?
The student: And opening
Another student: Ibn Malik presented it for him ...
The Shaykh : Yes, I do.
The student: And 'son of my brother,' is it like it?
The Shaykh : No, it is not like it.
The student: What is the difference?
The Shaykh : 'Son of my brother' is said as 'son of my brother' because this is more frequently used.
The student: He analyzed the verse and said: "Opening is a subject, and what permitted starting with an indefinite noun is its occurrence in the context of division, or breaking is conjoined to opening, and deletion is conjoined to breaking, and the waw in it means 'with,' a deleted genitive, and the yaa is the genitive to which it is added, 'continues' is a past tense verb and its subject is a hidden pronoun, permissible to estimate as 'he,' referring to the deleted yaa, and the sentence is in the position of the predicate of the subject, in the preposition 'O son of my mother' is genitive with it".
The Shaykh : Enough, enough, what is he saying?
The student: He says: 'O son of my mother,' 'son' is a genitive noun in the accusative case, 'mother' is the genitive to which it is added, genitive with a hidden kasrah on what is before the yaa of the speaker, which is deleted for estimation, and the yaa is a deleted genitive to which it is added, a second grammatical analysis for 'O son of my mother' in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: He said: "Two names built on the fathah in the position of the accusative, and they are a vocative with a genitive", 'son of my mother' is a genitive, and the estimated yaa is an additional genitive, in another grammatical analysis: 'O son of my mother,' 'son' is a vocative with a genitive in the accusative case, 'mother': the genitive to which it is added, genitive with a hidden kasrah on its end, prevented from appearing by the fathah matching the alif converted from the yaa deleted for lightening, and the deleted alif is the genitive to which it is added.
The Shaykh : It became that 'Isaam considers it present.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : So we say on this basis: 'O son of my mother': 'son' is a genitive and 'mother' is the genitive to which it is added, genitive by addition, and its sign of genitive is a hidden kasrah on what is before the yaa deleted for lightening, and 'mother' is a genitive, and the yaa is deleted for lightening, the genitive to which it is added, or we leave it and do not speak of it, as long as it is not present, we do not say: the genitive to which it is added, in: 'O son of my mother': 'son' is a genitive and 'mother' is the genitive to which it is added, genitive by addition and its sign of genitive is a hidden kasrah on what is before the alif converted from the yaa deleted for lightening, he said:
"And in the vocative, 'No, mother, presented'":
The student: Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The reader: "If the one being called is added to something added to the yaa of the speaker, it is obligatory to keep the yaa, except in 'son of my mother' and 'son of my uncle,' where the yaa is deleted from both due to frequent usage, and the mimm is broken or opened, so you say".
The Shaykh : Yes
The reader: "The mimm is broken or opened, so you say: 'O son of my mother, come forward' and 'O son of my mother, come forward,' and 'O son of my uncle, there is no escape,' with the mimm opened and broken".
In the marginal note, it says: "The presence of the yaa in 'O son of my mother' has been reported in the words of Abu Jaliyib al-Tai, mourning his brother: 'O son of my mother, and O brother of my soul *** You have left me in a severe age'".
The Shaykh : And it was reported!
The student: "And the conversion of the yaa to an alif and its retention in 'daughter of my uncle,' due to the words of Abu al-Najm: 'O daughter of my uncle, do not blame me'".
The Shaykh : And the grammatical analysis?
The student: The grammatical analysis in the vocative: "And in the vocative".
The Shaykh : No, no, before that, look at the grammatical analysis of the alfiyyah, what does it say?
The student: And opening
Another student: Ibn Malik presented it for him ...
The Shaykh : Yes, I do.
The student: And 'son of my brother,' is it like it?
The Shaykh : No, it is not like it.
The student: What is the difference?
The Shaykh : 'Son of my brother' is said as 'son of my brother' because this is more frequently used.
The student: He analyzed the verse and said: "Opening is a subject, and what permitted starting with an indefinite noun is its occurrence in the context of division, or breaking is conjoined to opening, and deletion is conjoined to breaking, and the waw in it means 'with,' a deleted genitive, and the yaa is the genitive to which it is added, 'continues' is a past tense verb and its subject is a hidden pronoun, permissible to estimate as 'he,' referring to the deleted yaa, and the sentence is in the position of the predicate of the subject, in the preposition 'O son of my mother' is genitive with it".
The Shaykh : Enough, enough, what is he saying?
The student: He says: 'O son of my mother,' 'son' is a genitive noun in the accusative case, 'mother' is the genitive to which it is added, genitive with a hidden kasrah on what is before the yaa of the speaker, which is deleted for estimation, and the yaa is a deleted genitive to which it is added, a second grammatical analysis for 'O son of my mother' in the accusative case.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: He said: "Two names built on the fathah in the position of the accusative, and they are a vocative with a genitive", 'son of my mother' is a genitive, and the estimated yaa is an additional genitive, in another grammatical analysis: 'O son of my mother,' 'son' is a vocative with a genitive in the accusative case, 'mother': the genitive to which it is added, genitive with a hidden kasrah on its end, prevented from appearing by the fathah matching the alif converted from the yaa deleted for lightening, and the deleted alif is the genitive to which it is added.
The Shaykh : It became that 'Isaam considers it present.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : So we say on this basis: 'O son of my mother': 'son' is a genitive and 'mother' is the genitive to which it is added, genitive by addition, and its sign of genitive is a hidden kasrah on what is before the yaa deleted for lightening, and 'mother' is a genitive, and the yaa is deleted for lightening, the genitive to which it is added, or we leave it and do not speak of it, as long as it is not present, we do not say: the genitive to which it is added, in: 'O son of my mother': 'son' is a genitive and 'mother' is the genitive to which it is added, genitive by addition and its sign of genitive is a hidden kasrah on what is before the alif converted from the yaa deleted for lightening, he said:
"And in the vocative, 'No, mother, presented'":
The student: Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes.